sadly as far as I know there is no way to encrypt DNA.
Luckily DNA is naturally encrypted.
sadly as far as I know there is no way to encrypt DNA.
Luckily DNA is naturally encrypted.
It's encoded, not encrypted.
Same difference.
I recommend you watch the movie GATTACA.What does dropping hairs have to do with it?
Well, it could be information infringement while also be grand theft of your personal privacy. It doesn't have to just be one thing.While I personally agree with you, you are probably going to run into arguments by the people that pirate stuff. It's not "stealing" because they are not taking something tangible from you and denying you access to it. You still have your information, it's just that they do now as well.
Apparently, that's not stealing, though, it's just "information infringement" or something like that.![]()
Here is an interesting approach to an incompetent and meddling government which is becoming more and more like a police state over time:
From today's newspaper:
When the government questioned him, this professor decided to make his entire life public. Why? To keep his privacy.
You Want to Track Me? Here You Go, F.B.I.
This seems to be a reasonably decent strategy. Perhaps we should all overload the bureaucratic busybodies with endless picayune details of our lives.
[URL="http://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2011/11/01/a-really-crazy-way-to-stay-private-and-baffle-the-fbi/"]Sophos Blog[/URL] said:Im sorry to say that Mr. Elahi is wrong.
[...]
But regarding what we as citizens should learn from his exploits, I strongly agree with two commenters in a Slashdot posting.
The first lesson, from ohnocitizen: There is nothing that a citizen can gain by handing information over to authorities, regardless of how charmed his interrogators surely were by this articulate artist. Flooding the FBI with information and hoping for privacy is like talking to the police and hoping for clemency, ohnocitizen writes.
[...]
The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution ensures that No person shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself.
There are extremely good reasons to invoke this, as the law school professor and former criminal defense attorney outlines in the lecture mentioned by ohnocitizen. One of the most compelling is that anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law.
Given that the laws of this land have grown to a point that they are now considered unquantifiable, there is no way that anybody can open their mouths and say anything that cant potentially be used against them.
I also agree with this Slashdot comment from this Anonymous Coward, who states:
Mr. Elahi seems to confuse the fact that the FBI may no longer care about his daily whereabouts with the fact that they can't sort through the data should every one do what he's doing. Will it be more difficult? Yes, but it's not impossible. Google searches the web in near real-time using sophisticated indexing strategies and there is no reason to believe that the FBI couldn't do the same with people and publicly available information to obtain statistically meaningful deviations from normal behavior on your part which could then be referred for human followup.
As dusty as my analytics knowledge is, Anonymous Cowards words all ring true.
I applaud Mr. Elahis artistic talents. But Id still suggest that we all guard our privacy and cherish the Fifth Amendment.
How many people post the results of their past urine and DNA tests to the internet?
While I personally agree with you, you are probably going to run into arguments by the people that pirate stuff. It's not "stealing" because they are not taking something tangible from you and denying you access to it. You still have your information, it's just that they do now as well.
Apparently, that's not stealing, though, it's just "information infringement" or something like that.![]()
When personal information are obtained/released without my consent.
This...When personal information are obtained/released without my consent.