Right, lets deal with this in the order presented.
Who got involved in a colonial war on land that belongs to the UNA?
Canada was not UNA land. The situation could be vaguely compared to the current situation in Africa, where an alliance member collapsed. However, thats ignoring the biggest difference:
Canada petitioned for annexation.
Who invaded land on another continent that belongs to Colombia and Peru?
No war was fought against Colombia, although it should have been. Either way, this is part of the greater War on Communism.
Who attacked a new government that promises to free the people from oppression by a iron-fisted ruler?
Now you're starting to get ridiculous. We are liberating these territories from Communist tyranny. You slander the late Kan, and glorify a kleptocratic movement.
Who wants to control all of Africa by a single nation?
This is just untrue, and demonstrably so. Are Egypt and Libya in Africa? Yes. Are they ruled by different countries? Yes.
Who turned on its ally Britain?
This displays such a titanic and willful ignorance of the situation I shouldn't even bother. But I will anyways. The first, and most obvious point is that we were no longer allies at the time. A war was fought to defend British land from external aggression. Accordian soldiers fought and died for Britain. And then they leave the Accord, make a seperate peace, and begin making slanderous remarks about the Accord and its allies. Not only that, but the issue that they claimed to leave us over was resolved almost immediately afterwards.
To recap, Accordian soldiers fought and died to defend Britain, who then cuts, runs, and then turns around and slanders the Accord. Do you see why perhaps the Accord may have been slightly annoyed?
The Accord has accused almost everyone else of being imperialists when it turns out that they, especially France and Swaziland, are the worst imperialists of us all!
All of your accusations have proven false.
I do, however, find it interesting that when I pointed out a much better, and simpler way to help the people in former Saoirse, you say nothing about it and instead fling out accusations of imperialism. If you really wanted to help, then the money would be better spent donated to Red Star. This would mean the only possible reason you want to "help" them is to take possession of their land, especially since your reaction to me pointing this out is to try and distract from the issue.