warpus
In pork I trust
You can be the follower of any holy book (including the Bible) and still be wrong.
If this is directed at me, your post is a shining example of missing my point.I believe you are missing the fact that Islam is link to these suicide bombing as Baneblade pointed out.
Yes you can, you can condemn it using the Koran and you can support them using the Koran. Both have been done for many of years allready.You see you can't condemn Osama bin Laden actions with the Koran
I didn't say he was, since I am not going to define what a muslim should be doing to be a follower of Islam. Are you saying he is more of a muslim ot more of a follower of Islam than the people I mentioned?nor show he is less of a Muslims nor less of a follower of Islam.
And in other places it supports them.The Bible even in the OT condemns someone taking matters in his own hand.
Wow. An example. Colour me unimpressedA good example is Moses who murdered that Egyptian guard thinking he was doing God's bidding. The scriptures clearly show Moses wasn't. It was 40 years latter when God called Moses to lead the children out of Egypt and even then he didn't act alone.
These suicide bombers are in the wrong. They are followers of an interpretation of the Koran.It's true that most Muslims are peaceful yet it's hard to make the claim these suicide bombers are in the wrong and not followers of the Koran.
I would say Osama bin Laden is closer to the acts of Muhammad than anyone else today especially those you quoted. So I fail to see how you are going to use the Koran to condemn his actions.Yes you can, you can condemn it using the Koran and you can support them using the Koran. Both have been done for many of years allready.
Yes, you would say that.I would say Osama bin Laden is closer to the acts of Muhammad than anyone else today especially those you quoted.
Indeed, I believe you do.So I fail to see how you are going to use the Koran to condemn his actions.
I would say Osama bin Laden is closer to the acts of Muhammad than anyone else today especially those you quoted. So I fail to see how you are going to use the Koran to condemn his actions.
You're an appeaser, and obviously without knowledge.
There are 150 sentences in the Koran promoting/demanding violence and supression versus unbelievers.
Out of a total of 63175......
Over 80% of the muslims polled IN THE UK are in favour of Shariah law.
SHARIAH LAW! You know, women are dirty, unbelievers are "Untermenschen" and thiefs and woman who have sex with whom they want should be hacked to pieces.
Its more like only 40%. And when they say Sharia Law, i believe they meant a more mordern, more reformed more secular version of it.
From Wiki
Secularists believe the law of the state should be based on secular principles, not on Islamic legal theory.
Traditionalists believe that the law of the state should be based on the traditional legal schools. However, traditional legal views are considered unacceptable by most modern Muslims, especially in areas like women's rights or slavery.[6]
Reformers believe that new Islamic legal theories can produce modernized Islamic law [7] and lead to acceptable opinions in areas such as women's rights.[8]
Salafis believe that the traditional schools were wrong, and therefore failed, and strive to follow the generation of early Muslims.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2006/02/19/nsharia19.xml
Also in this link
Four out of 10 British Muslims want sharia law introduced into parts of the country, a survey reveals today.
The ICM opinion poll also indicates that a fifth have sympathy with the "feelings and motives" of the suicide bombers who attacked London last July 7, killing 52 people, although 99 per cent thought the bombers were wrong to carry out the atrocity
as for your 100 or so terrorists, http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/,
notice the counter on the left-hand side.
Notice its a very bias website? Insolent .......
And then tell me how many large scale muslim demonstrations against terrorism you have seen since 9/11 ?
Google it stupid.......http://www.google.com.sg/search?svn...inst terrorism &oe=UTF-8&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=iw
As for stupid and unnecessary crusade comparisons:
a) When did the last happen?
b) The first Crusade began in 1095 460 years after the first Christian city was overrun by Muslim armies, 457 years after Jerusalem was conquered by Muslim armies, 453 years after Egypt was taken by Muslim armies, 443 after Muslims first plundered Italy, 427 years after Muslim armies first laid siege to the Christian capital of Constantinople, 380 years after Spain was conquered by Muslim armies, 363 years after France was first attacked by Muslim armies, 249 years after Rome itself was sacked by a Muslim army, and only after centuries of church burnings, killings, enslavement and forced conversions of Christians.
Okay this bit i was wrong but i do feel like pointing out this old old old line
The muslim never masscared the citizen both times they took it while the Christians killed every christian, Jew and muslim inside....
Like the 5 or 7 people killed by the crazy abortionist fundies in the last 35 years?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Liberation_Front_of_Tripura
And then tell me how many christians doesn't react with "It's a shame" or "These people are psychotic" and instead start arguing how they are suppressed by imperialists, democrats, americans and the jewish world conspiracy?
Ten Characters
I would say Jesus and his father are/is closer to the acts of Hitler than any one else. They were happy to commit genocide against innocent people, kill kids newly born, and wipe out almost all humanity under water. How can you worship such a family of murderers and claim you are following a religion of peace?
Religionofpeace is a biased webside with an agenda. Like all people and organisations. Luckily for them they don't have to lie to further their agenda, as long as there are multiple muslim terrorist attacks a day.
And only 40% of british muslims want shariah. geeh, now i'm happy. We only have some 3-5% Nazi supporter in some small parts of the country. let's sit back and relax.
As for the blabla of reformation, just look at islamic countries. Not one which comes even near to our perception of human rights and democracy. Or look how people who want reformation are treated by the majority.
Stupid and unnecessary.
For one, there's the new and old testament, and alll mainstream christians agree that the the new is our guide=Jesus rolemodel.
As for your god comparison, yeah well, as soon as we get godhood i would expect a lot of floodbased christian terrror. Ever seen a christian claim god as a rolemodel?
Muslim's claim Mohammed as a rolemodell= Warfare, massacres, lying, suppression of women, suppression of unbelievers and . .. .. .. .ing 9 year old girls.
Religionofpeace is a biased webside with an agenda. Like all people and organisations. Luckily for them they don't have to lie to further their agenda, as long as there are multiple muslim terrorist attacks a day.
And only 40% of british muslims want shariah. geeh, now i'm happy. We only have some 3-5% Nazi supporter in some small parts of the country. let's sit back and relax.
As for the blabla of reformation, just look at islamic countries. Not one which comes even near to our perception of human rights and democracy. Or look how people who want reformation are treated by the majority.
Stupid and unnecessary.
For one, there's the new and old testament, and alll mainstream christians agree that the the new is our guide=Jesus rolemodel.
As for your god comparison, yeah well, as soon as we get godhood i would expect a lot of floodbased christian terrror. Ever seen a christian claim god as a rolemodel?
Muslim's claim Mohammed as a rolemodell= warfare, massacres, lying, suppression of women, suppression of unbelievers and . .. .. .. .ing 9 year old girls.
Now your being unreasonable
Do you know Islam had actually elevated Woman's rights. See for yourself
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_and_Islam
Mohammed never massacred outside battle what a lie
There were Jews in Medina, none of them were forced to convert
And he never did it with a 9 year old girl.
Man your such a bias piece of bodily waste, talking before thinking. You have constanly flame Islam. Did you see me taking much of a swing at Christianity?
Tell me Pannonius. Tell me what actions of Genocide has the Prophet done?
Muslims also believe in Old Testament God! They believe Muhammad is the last of his prophets. So it looks that they also believe in this "genocidal monster", don't they?
Tell me Pannonius. Tell me what actions of Genocide has the Prophet done?
Now your being unreasonable
Do you know Islam had actually elevated Woman's rights. See for yourself
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_and_Islam
Now your being unreasonable
Mohammed never massacred outside battle what a lie
And he never did it with a 9 year old girl.