From Dacoillyria
To Khmer and Dukunnugeya:
The answers for the questions you asked. If there is more you want to ask, feel free to do so.
TO: Dacoillyrian Empire
FROM: Khmer Empire
Your economic theory as presented is poor. You are assuming that the potentiality of the limited number of members of the League will be as great as the sum of the entire Mediterranean. This is clearly impossible as the League is smaller than the Mediterranean, if only fractionally. In short, the number of markets will be smaller, and thus so will trade. It is a smaller order system.
You have to remember that many of the nations haven't been trading on an organized level before. Most people who have had trade agreements have had one either with DIE or with Carthage, now we are trying to establish a full Mediterranean-wide trade system for the first time in history.
Furthermore, we might note, by cutting off “rogue nations,” (which is useless nomenclature as the League is clearly designed to cripple Carthage, as none of Carthage's "allies" (Nortugal only) are even in the Mediterranean)
We know that there aren't many allies of Carthage doing trade in Mediterranean (Nortugal is one), but this is also a great way to make sure that there won't be nations as such in the future either. I won't deny that this League wouldn't be directed as some sort of a trade embargo against Carthage. I once again emphasize that this League of ours will not hurt anyone who is not closely tied with Carthage.
all you are doing is enabling anyone who does trade with them to possess a monopoly on that trade; a highly lucrative position.
I think that losing one's reputation and respect as well as membership and chance to trade with the rest of the Mediterranean will be a deterrent enough.
Carthage is not some backwater that will miraculously lose goods to trade if it is simply isolated.
We think it is, especially now that our navies have divided it. And will likely become more so in the future. But we shall see.
Your attempts at portraying this as altruism are likewise poor. This League only makes sense on two conditions: one, that the League will actively move to prevent trade with these so-called "rogue nations,"
We will first see how many rogue nations there will be after the creation of this, and then see what we can do to prevent this trading. Hopefully peaceful actions (such as closing our ports from their ships) will be enough.
and two, that the League's ultimate objective is the destruction of Carthage precisely to remove a threat to its powerbase (which it is attempting to isolate with the creation of this League in order to limit its ability to resist ongoing military action).
Notice that some members of the League are neutral in the war against Carthage.
Well it says clearly in the Charter that Carthage is banned from the League, so I won't deny that

. But the goals of this League are purely economical, nothing more. When it comes down to the complete
destruction of Carthage, we have a separate organization for that - our military alliance.
Lastly, the notion of spreading economic prosperity is ridiculous. Trade is at its very core an expression of competition, not cooperation.
I tend to disagree. In cooperation, the amount of trade excercised will grow rapidly, increasing the total economic flow in the area where it is excercised. By this all sides can benefit. That is of course a matter of opinion - or, more precisely, a matter of which economic theory one finds most belieavable. See what Dis said, which I also quoted at the end of this post.
To propose spreading wealth equally is either foolishness or propaganda. This is simply a form of economic warfare designed to destroy an opponent, and to function as economic protectionism designed to put the economically weak nations of the Mediterranean in a superior position to foreign commercial powers in their own markets.
Well it can hardly get any
less equal than Carthage ripping everyone else off. I won't deny that we wouldn't use this League to block Carthage from trading in the Mediterranean, I have admitted that directly in the Charter itself, so I don't understand what the misunderstanding is. What comes down to rising the economic status of nations around the Mediterranean, why would we create a League as this if we didn't want that? It does not, however, have to happen at the expense of foreign powers (see the answer to previous question), simple increase of trade in the now-so-stagnant Mediterranean should do the trick, or so our economists estimate.
We are not children, and we did not arrive at our position as the greatest mercantile power in the world by believing blindly in promises and good intentions. If you want our support for this measure you will deal with us frankly and honestly, or not at all.
I will be as frank as I can.
As part of such a truthful policy, we demand to know exactly what it is we are signing on to, and as such we require an explanation as to the precise intentions of Dacoillyria and its allies regarding the restoration of the lands of Carthage to the international trade network following its defeat.
Carthagian trade routes will end up at the hands of the League, to ensure that it's collapse will not devastate the trading in the area.
Limitation of trade is abhorrent to us and we wish to know what is to be done to restore the areas of that nation and their resources to circulation with minimum possible disruption so we may adjust our investiture accordingly (OOC: in short, the postwar settlement).
The plan at the moment is: all nations in the alliance will get their share of the trade network that formerly belonged to Carthage, and all League nations will be joined in that trade network to create a network far larger than the one Carthage ever had at the Mediterranean.
We will also require assurances of equality in trade rights and protection under the law for our merchantry vis-à-vis the local merchantry of League nations; we will be dealt with as equals in any and all trade agreements and in all commercial markets.
Nothing will change for you regarding your Mediterranean trading, except maybe that from now on you can reach the entire Mediterranean easier than before, as the networks will be increased and made more effective.
About your equal rights: the League Charter, as you can see, does not require member nations to oppress you in trading in any way. The favouritism-rule mentioned will not include foreign nations wanting to trade in the Mediterranean, as all trading happening in Mediterranean is good for its developement. If you want further assurance from member nations, you will need to demand it from them separately, because I - as the spokesman of our league - don't have the authority to speak for them in this issue as the answer to the question has nothing to do with the League charter. As a spokesman of the Dacoillyrian Empire, however, I can assure you that DIE will not oppress any nation trading in the Mediterranean.
Should these two conditions be met we will consider support for this League rather more seriously.
You do that.
the world economy is not a single pot of stew in that someone receiving a larger portion requires another to have less, but a orchard where a skillful grower may cause his tree to bear more fruit without having to steal apples form his neighbour.
Well said, dis
