K: Whats the point?

Rather we should get rid of C, since S and K both do what C does, but more explicitly, and just use "C" for the "CH" sound.

Then again, we'd have to come up with new ways of determining pronunciation, due to words such as "puking" vs "pucking". I guess a double k instead of ck for pucking would work.
 
Rather we should get rid of C, since S and K both do what C does, but more explicitly, and just use "C" for the "CH" sound.

Then again, we'd have to come up with new ways of determining pronunciation, due to words such as "puking" vs "pucking". I guess a double k instead of ck for pucking would work.

This.

In the revised 25 letter alphabet:

puking = pukeing
pucking = puking
 
Q is a far more pointless letter. QU = KW/CW
 
Then again, we'd have to come up with new ways of determining pronunciation, due to words such as "puking" vs "pucking". I guess a double k instead of ck for pucking would work.
That's the way we do it in Dutch...

There also used to be a large movement that wanted to get rid of the 'c' in Dutch (except for ch and sch), and replace it by 'k' or 's'. This was called the "alternative spelling". For instance they wrote 'kultuur' instead of 'cultuur'. About 15 years ago, new spelling rules were determined by the Dutch Language Union (Nederlandse Taal Unie), but they kept the 'c' in almost all cases, and since then the alternative spelling has almost died out.
 
Why eliminate letters? I went to the bother of learning the nuances of this damn language I'm not going to have people changing it on me! Thats why I like to be a grammar nazi - I have a stake in keeping things the way I like to spell.
 
Why eliminate letters? I went to the bother of learning the nuances of this damn language I'm not going to have people changing it on me! Thats why I like to be a grammar nazi - I have a stake in keeping things the way I like to spell.


So are you a 'bollicks', a 'bollocks', or a 'bollix' man?
 
Back
Top Bottom