Thanks for the effort.
Trajan13 said:
One tiny gripe - I guess it's official that the Roman UU will be the Praetorian... which is just dandy 'cept the Legions, not the Praetorians, were the true military force of the Roman empire. The Praetorians were bodyguards who meddled in politics from time to time, and served in a few military campaigns. Yet, they were small in number(never exceeding 9000 men total), and it is a travesty to neglect the Legion, the most innovative and successful military unit for hundreds of years, in favor of a handful of bodyguards.[/rant] I'll be changing that right quick once I get my copy.
I also think the Romans should get their Legionaries back. But when you think about it, the Persians get their Immortals for the second time, which somehow were equivalent to the Praetorian Guards (small elite unit).
Furthermore, a few points on some UUs.
- The Immortals seem to be oddly depicted for the second time : first, a replacement for the swordsmen, and second, a replacement for the chariots. Many history buffs said here that the Immortals were soldiers with bows and light equipment... Also, it is strange to see this unit using graphics from a horseman and still replacing the chariot. Add to this that the Persians originated from the Zagros Mountains in today-Iran, were an Indo-European tribe emerging in the Iron Age, whereas chariots' main period of glory took place in the Bronze Age in Semitic empires of Mesopotamia and the Egyptian Neo-Empire.
- Why reverting back to Civ1 and Civ2's Phalanx ? Civ3's Hoplite just seemed fine to name the Greek soldier. Also, are Greek shields round ? The terrain colour in the back makes it confusing...
- The French Musketeer has 2 movement points ??
This is so far the real oddity out of those UUs.
Otherwise this sounds good. I can't see how promotions will work yet, but they do seem important, even more than a simple strength upgrade. The ability to choose the upgrade unit is also a welcome addition, and it seems to profit early UUs more.