Migrant Crimes Add Volatile Element to Austria’s Election

FriendlyFire

Codex WMDicanious
Joined
Jan 4, 2002
Messages
21,761
Location
Sydney
This is why you need careful screening and should only accept family groups.
Instead we have gang rapes, murders and increase in crime. Thus increasing back lash and reluctance to accept immigrants from Muslim countries.

Start deporting single males
Keep the families and females
Only accept how many society can afford

Migrant Crimes Add Volatile Element to Austria’s Electio

By any measure, the string of crimes has been terrible. A grandmother of three, walking her dog, raped along a riverbank. A 10-year-old boy sexually assaulted at a public swimming pool. A 21-year-old student gang raped near the giant Ferris wheel at Vienna’s famed Prater park. A 54-year-old woman beaten to death on the street.

The fact that the crimes were committed by recent migrants from war zones and an immigrant who had lived illegally in the country for years added an especially volatile element to the political climate ahead of the presidential election on Sunday, when Austria could become the first European country to elect a far-right candidate as head of state since the end of Nazism.

At least 90,000 people applied for asylum in this country of 8.4 million before Austria’s government shut its borders and persuaded all the Balkan states, through which the migrants trekked from Greece, to follow suit.

But especially grim acts, starting with the rape of the grandmother in September, have been hashed over with increasing intensity, feeding the anti-migrant sentiment that helped propel Mr. Hofer to first place in the first round last month.

The man accused of attacking her mother, an Afghan who was caught some weeks later, denied his actions until D.N.A. evidence identified him.

he was a minor when he committed the crime, to 20 months in jail for the rape and stealing a pack of cigarettes. That sentence, while in line with treatment of minors in Austria, was ridiculed by one of Ms. Bubis’s lawyers, Dietmar Heck, as too mild.

Mr. Mahrer said some of these young migrants had arrived from war zones, with completely un-Western views about women.

“They do not respect the same things we do,” Mr. Mahrer said. But, he asked, are foreign offenders less equal before the law than Austrians?

A measure of how widespread calls for “zero tolerance” have become came in the last TV debate between the two presidential candidates. Mr. Van der Bellen said episodes like the assaults on women in Cologne required a tough response “because that is an attempt to occupy a certain public space, and that we won’t countenance.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/22/w...=WhatsNext&contentID=WhatsNext&pgtype=article
 
Mr. Mahrer said some of these young migrants had arrived from war zones, with completely un-Western views about women.

Stop stop stop. That's not even worth mentioning. If someone is so fundamentally incompatible with western society as to not be able to refrain from raping women or robbing people, then they can stay in a refugee camp in rural Turkey.
 
The European political elites are reaping what sowed. Merkel's bid for the Nobel Peace Prize will be responsible for the election of quite a few far-right parties throughout the continent and the rise of xenophobia and nativism.

Who thought anything could go wrong in accepting millions of young Middle Eastern men in a short period of time?
 
Warning: rant thread, Expect lost of fact-free, nonsensical statements.

To wit: 5 criminal acts on a population of 90,000 immigrants? That's below average criminality, and even below expected criminality. Interesting how ranters can twist facts around...
 
Warning: rant thread, Expect lost of fact-free, nonsensical statements.

To wit: 5 criminal acts on a population of 90,000 immigrants? That's below average criminality, and even below expected criminality. Interesting how ranters can twist facts around...

Anf they also have a positive effect on our societies. Since new years eve in Cologne, even conservatives in Bavaria are now against sexism. That would have been unthinkable two years ago.
 
The Austrians should take the advice of the mayor of Cologne and just stay an arms length away from immigrants.
 
Warning: rant thread, Expect lost of fact-free, nonsensical statements.

To wit: 5 criminal acts on a population of 90,000 immigrants? That's below average criminality, and even below expected criminality. Interesting how ranters can twist facts around...

Come on man, you're smart enough to know those five incidents aren't the only ones. I'm not saying I agree with the OP, but this post is being more than a little disingenuous. Is it really so hard to admit that maybe it wasn't exactly the best, brightest, and most law-abiding citizens that fled the war zones?

Now that I think it about it though, I kinda like the OP's solution: If you fled with your family, you get to stay; if you are a young, adult, single male, you're going to be sent to a refugee camp in Turkey at the earliest possible convenience.
 
Sounds pretty sexist to me.
 
Maybe if men don't want to be discriminated against, they shouldn't commit a huge proportion of violent crime and crime generally.

Uh, imagine if someone said about an ethnic group...
 
Maybe if men don't want to be discriminated against, they shouldn't commit a huge proportion of violent crime and crime generally.
That's what some people say about black people who have considerably higher crime stats than white people in America.
When people say that it may make sense to focus on black people they're usually quickly called racist as well.

Either solution seems a bad solution to me. Punish individual immigrant males for crimes that not they, but the group they belong to has committed, is pretty unjust. Punish people only AFTER they have committed a crime and you have a lot of innocent people become the victim of crimes. Somebody is going to be treated unjustly, no matter what.

In general though we have decided that "Innocent until proven guilty" in better than doing it the other way around, I don't see a good reason to do a 180* on this one issue. Seems hypocritical to me.
 
Ah OK.

Anyway, it does make sense to discriminate against men in some contexts.
 
Back
Top Bottom