I'm not always against the statement 'some posters in this thread', in that sometimes you want to make a point without picking a fight. Some posters cannot help but being hyper-aggressive to any percieved slight or disagreement and statements such as the one above can sometimes help you avoid unnecessary nastiness. However, in the context of the way it was used in this thread, this exception does not apply and is indeed ball-less.Ziggy Stardust said:Usually the ball-less tactic of being ambiguous when referring to "some posters in this thread" gets by unnoticed when the thread has a couple of pages.
irony
What you should be learning from this thread is that I am an ally to those against the regulations I the OP. The question is why many can't be consistent in their logic and similarly be my ally against AWBs.
More irony! You just can't help yourselves!
Yes, because video games are exactly like guns.
This is the worst comparison I've seen anywhere this week. You are just reiterating the idiocy put forward by this senator (or whoever) that video games have any sort of tie to violence.
New debate tactic: whenever your opponent says something, anything, just say, "Oh, the irony!" and proceed to insult them.
This thread is turning very ridiculous.
Turning?
Wait until he sees that Obama will likely discuss video games today.
He mentioned it in passing.