NOTW XXIV - The Age of Despair (Caravan Thread)

Caravan Morning 2

Though the timepieces all said that it was morning, the sun seemed to belie it. The Sky was a dark, heavy grey, weighing the sky down. It seemed to all those who awoke that morning that the roof of the world was bearing down upon them, held up only be the mountains of the Khazad, in the distance.

In their stereotypical manner, the Caravan was preparing to move, though in utter chaos. Angry cries and swears filled the air, as people moved.

Then a great keening came from the Carnival’s Wagon. Ozbenno burst from the door in tears, followed by a somber Methos, who spoke:


The land of ice calls
It’s son is gone forever
And we will weep long


Spoiler :


Izipo was innocent



It was a much subdued caravan that set off towards the lands of Ice.


Voting is Open
 
A dead freak, whats going on here?

I suspect Ozbenno - jealous that the freak gets all the attention and vistors whilst the lion tamer (without a lion) has not a chance to share in the circus glory and profits - either that or the Ringmaster has been spending a little too much time in the freak tent after hours. Ladies of the circus do strange things when the green eyed monster rears it's ugly head.

Strokes the beard, yes my theory makes perfect sense.

*Edit*

My suspcion of Ozbenno seems to be unfounded, Her grief for the Freak seems truthful. Therefore i must withdraw my vote.
 
Grieving Izipo you may. But it is often true that the murderers are those closest to the victim. Maybe Izipo told you something he shouldn't have done. At any rate it would be nice if you could explain yourself Ozbenno.
 
I don't know if Ozbenno is a wolf or an innocent, but when I contacted Oyzar asking him why they are attacking him, he instead replies back wanting to know what I have to prove he's innocent. Seems like a wolfish move to me, Oyzar. If you had something against him, you could have simply said so and I would have used it to decide my vote. Instead you act hostile and guilty.
 
Hmmm...Methos has a good point. I will vote Oyzar as well. *returns to his thoughts*
 
I cannot say for sure. But Methos has a good point. We cannot go the guilty unless proven innocent route, to many innocents shall die that way. Speak up Oyzar, tell us why you are so quicky to condemn Ozbenno
 
I don't know if Ozbenno is a wolf or an innocent, but when I contacted Oyzar asking him why they are attacking him, he instead replies back wanting to know what I have to prove he's innocent. Seems like a wolfish move to me, Oyzar. If you had something against him, you could have simply said so and I would have used it to decide my vote. Instead you act hostile and guilty.

I do not have any information about a lot of people, i don't have any information about anyone being out to kill everyone, as such i vote for those who i have no information for innocence.. You and Ozbenno were the ones who are most likely to have spoken to Izipo before he died. Maybe he told someone something he shouldn't have. Personally i didn't get to talk to him. I am just trying to find out who the bad guys might be. Maybe it was you Izipo told something he shouldn't have and hence ended up dead?
 
As i said i am just trying to find who the bad guys might be. Maybe you don't like people looking for bad guys Methos? Maybe you rather want everyone to sit around quietly doing nothing?
 
Maybe he told someone something he shouldn't have.
<snip>
Maybe it was you Izipo told something he shouldn't have and hence ended up dead?

A weak statement with absolutely no basis considering we are talking about Izipo.

As i said i am just trying to find who the bad guys might be. Maybe you don't like people looking for bad guys Methos? Maybe you rather want everyone to sit around quietly doing nothing?

I don't trust players who just randomly pick people for absolutely no reason. If you had evidence or something he, or anyone, said, then that would be different. But you never talked to Izipo and apparently you never talked to Ozbenno either, so there is absolutely no basis. This early in the game we don't have evidence of any of us being innocent, so that argument is weak too.

This is why typically the first day or two players vote the inactives.
 
OOC: btw, what are we voting for? Who has to do the washing up? Designated Driver? :lol:
I see no mention of lynching anywhere. I do think oyzar should wash the dishes, though.
 
Reacting to a lynch vote with a reciprocal accusation is rather wolf-like. Why methos would be a wolf for being suspcious of quick accusations, I can't see. Methos might have been wrong, but the logical thing to do would have been to argue Ozbenno's guilt, not make a reciprocal accusation. I vote Oyzar.
 
oyzar, your lack of reason for voting against Ozbenno is quite disturbing.
 
But that leaves us with a question. Who else would it be then? So far yourself and Methos are the only others someone has accused. Perhaps Kingmorgan is guily for having origionally started the attacks? Seems unlikely, considering . Methos for starting the attack on Oyzar, who may actually be innocent? But Methos had a solid point behind his accusation. But considering that Ozbenno is the one that this all seems to have revolved around, I'll follow that lead and remove my accusation from Oyzar
 
Perhaps Kingmorgan is guily for having origionally started the attacks?

I originally guessed that Oyzar had put KingMorgan up to the attack and KingMorgan confirmed this via both PM and IM. I currently have no intention of changing my vote and will stick with my accusation of Oyzar.
 
Back
Top Bottom