Odd new political test: Moral Foundations Test

But you're asking to comment on whether or not an action is moral. So you are, in essence, answering questions of morality.

But the questions are mostly bad. For example:

White socks uniform, player wears black socks. There's nothing immoral about it. It's kinda s****y, sure, but there's nothing wrong with doing so in of itself. He's a free human being and he's allowed to dress however the heck he wants. But if the question then said something like "The coach forced him to sit out for the next game for failing to abide by the uniform rules," then I'd very strongly say the action the coach took was moral. So depending on how the question is framed I can be both for and against the action the player took. As I said before, that's my problem with the quiz. It elicits a lot of "yeah, and?" responses because most of the questions are framed as "this person did something does that make you mad?"

The point is this quiz unfairly characterizes me as a libertarian because the questions are framed in a dumb way. To return to the question above: either I fill in the missing implication (i.e. I assume the question is about whether or not a coach would be justified in benching the player or kicking him off the team), or I answer the literal question presented me, in which case I answer 95% of the questions "agree strongly" and feel like I wasted a half hour taking a dumb quiz.

Then you just answer it as 'morally acceptable', if you don't think there's a moral dimension to the question.
 
Does the test randomize questions? I didn't get this question when I took it.
You've just reminded me of the other problem why I didn't like the test: I am getting a lot of questions, out of context, in which I have to rate situations along the following scale: -3, -2, -1, 0, +1, +2, +3
I don't get to see the others to compare how good or bad things are, relative to each other.
 
Interesting test. Still a little bit of awkward wording and/or lack of context as usual, but otherwise much better than the old political compass.

Your scores are:
Nurture 87.5%
Tradition 40.7%
Liberty 72.2%

Your strongest moral foundation is Nurture.
Your morality is closest to that of a Left-Liberal.

I found the relative comparisons to other respondents interesting. Put me right where I expected on the Liberty score, wedged between Left-Liberal and Conservative. Somehow more nurturing than average LL though? I think it was the numerous questions that boiled down to people being unnecessarily and casually rude and/or cruel. I mean, there were like 8 of those.
 
Your strongest moral foundation is Nurture.
Your morality is closest to that of a Left-Liberal.


This seems like default option for sane people:/
 
I've never heard of one who is. :crazyeye:

Of course you haven't. Authoritarians, to the modern media, to the academy, to the modern mind, bring to mind Darth Vader, or Hitler. They're obvious. They wear military uniforms, they have personality cults, etc. But tyranny can be soft and subtle. It can hide itself in warm, pastel-walled offices, in daring blazers-hung-over-a-peace-sign t-shirts. The supporters of modern tyranny have no idea they are supporting an authoritarian structure. They believe every variety of tax is simply 'fair share', and justify confiscating half a person's wealth automatically on that basis. They believe people have no rights other than those which the 'government', which is to say the people in power, find it more convenient to tolerate than to disallow. Thus property is a myth, and all levels of 'government' can dictate to people exactly how they can use their property, how to run their business, how to keep their homes. If their children enjoy the outside world unattended, then hello Child Protective Services. Etc.

I speak as someone who used to be a progressive, someone who read the Frankfurt School devotedly. I came to realize, however, while studying the life of Gandhi, that the aggressive control of other people's lives, even in the pursuit of justice, was morally wrong. I believe in progress, but it must be voluntary; I believe in justice, but it must be achieved through cooperation, not coercion. I believe in order, but it must be sustained from throughout society, not imposed from the top down.
 
Here's a test for what kind of villain you are.

http://www.celebritytypes.com/villain/test.php

actually results of this test surprisingly accurate.

my result is Mao Zedong

Personality Match
Like Mao Zedong, you are intellectually curious and novelty-seeking to a fault. You are bored by doing things the tried-and-true way and love nothing better than to embark on a new and challenging project. However, keep in mind that those around you may not appreciate experiments as much as you do - particularly if they will have to deal with the consequences long after you've lost interest and moved on.

Words of Warning
Points to consider for people with your personality - have you ever:

Chased after something completely new and untried because it stimulated your imagination, only to find that there were very good practical reasons that this particular solution had never been tried?

Found yourself unable to focus because you were on such an intellectual high that you positively wanted to do everything at once?

Driven others to exhaustion by seeking out argument and controversy, possibly even arguing both sides of a case just for the fun of it?
(especially this :p)

Found yourself unable "to leave well enough alone," always having to tinker and push against the boundaries just to see what would happen?

"Sweated the small stuff" and forgotten about important things like flight times, tax returns, and subscription renewals simply because you could not be bothered to deal with the nitty-gritty of practical matters?

According to studies from Cambridge University (UK) and Texas AM University (US), your scores indicate that you are:

Likely to have a richer vocabulary than the average person.

Likely to be more knowledgeable than the average person on political and societal issues.

Likely to have a quicker understanding of abstract concepts and ideas than the average person.

More spontaneous and flexible in your approach to problem solving than the average person.

More risk-prone, and less afraid of exposing yourself to risk, than the average person.

More likely than the average person to believe that "rules are meant to be broken" and to utilize that belief to your own advantage.

More likely than the average person to leave a messy room when you go to work in the morning.

Less preoccupied than the average person with how you are perceived in the eyes of others.

More psychologically robust and better at absorbing shocks and setbacks than the average person.

Less worried about stressors and threats in your environment than the average person; not being one to be easily irritated or upset.

Someone who performs better under pressure than the average person.
 
Is rocket that slightly spicy lettuce stuff? I'm not a fan.
 
Why on earth did you quote me and then talk about US presidents?
 
Fair enough. ;)
 
Your scores are:

Nurture 58.3%
Tradition 75%
Liberty 66.7%

Your strongest moral foundation is Tradition.
Your morality is closest to that of a Conservative.

Conservatism: Individuals in this group seek to retain the traditional social and economic order and to uphold the sovereignty of the state. They tend to see themselves as the defenders of what their forebears would have wanted, favoring strict immigration laws, traditional values, and a strong military. While they typically see a role for the state in matters of national security and culture, they tend to be more skeptical of state involvement in the economy. Conservatives typically have a balanced morality where all three foundations are represented in (roughly) equal proportions.
 
Not anymore!

The J is the only one who outpeforms my nurture score.

I guess that means he wants to bone his sister.

I prefer the sisters of other people :groucho:.

The same site has a load of other odd tests.

http://www.celebritytypes.com/personality-tests.php

Your personality is:
Masculine: 36%
Feminine: 0%

Your scores:
Masculine: Average
Feminine: Very Low

This makes you Casually Masculine

...um...yay?
(sadly true, not much of an alpha here)
 
Back
Top Bottom