I think that the 'love-making' component seems to apply whether it's hetero- or homo-, really. Obviously, it need not be procreative, but that's only a subset of the reason why sex is beneficial for some people.
Not really. If you'd like to argue against contraception, that's a different argument. That doesn't change the fact that gay sex does not make biological sense.
And I know people are going to say "But the animals do it!" Who cares? Animals are not the highest form of life, and animals do not have a moral conscience. This does not change the very real fact that gay marriage is fundamentally disordered because it comes from disordered desires that do not make biological sense and CANNOT be used for procreation.
I would consider it sex the same way oral is sex. That is to say, yes, but it is not a natural biological form of sex.
Because its a means of forcing society to view gay marriages as "Equal" when they are not natural.
These people are historically wrong. Marriage as an instutition has NEVER been a man and another man until modern homosexuals redefined the definitions. Even in ancient Greece and Rome where homosexuality was usually seen as acceptable, there was no gay marriage.
"The whole point of same sex marriage is to say it is exactly equal as an heterosexual marriage."
"Equal" does not mean "the same".
Don't get me started on BAQ BAH. It's the primary reason I got out of the military. Married guys got special treatment as far as I'm concerned, and the military treats single guys as second class citizens. Not only do they get paid more, but they work less hours, because the supervisors let them off whenever the wife has a problem at home. Which means the single guys are working even more hours.
I friggin' hated the military for that reason. The only reason to stay in until retirement is if you are married. It's a married man's society. I've only seen a couple single guys stick it out for 20 years.
I would consider it sex the same way oral is sex. That is to say, yes, but it is not a natural biological form of sex.
Once again, what do you mean by natural? What's natural about marriage?
Monogamy =/= Marriage
I just thought I'd point out that rape is more natural than monogamy
Would that make it more acceptable?
Apparently you've never heard of a 'common law' marriage, I take it?
I can be monogamous with someone I am not in a common law (or any other form of) marriage with and and be in a common law marriage with someone I am not monogamous with.
I would consider it sex the same way oral is sex. That is to say, yes, but it is not a natural biological form of sex.
Others eat their partner after copulation.Some species of animals mate for life....