Post-birth abortions?

Would you support a post-birth abortion?

  • Yes, but only within one week.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Yes, but only within one month.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Yes, but only within six months.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Yes, but only within one year.

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Yes, but only within three years.

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    18
Status
Not open for further replies.

amadeus

Bishop of Bio-Dome
Joined
Aug 30, 2001
Messages
40,126
Location
Weasel City
Considering that there is still some support for partial-birth abortions on this forum, what would you all think of post-birth abortions?

A post-birth abortion would be performed, of course, after the fetus/child is independently using all of its life functions.

Should their be a window after the fetus/child's birth for mothers to be able to terminate the life functions of that fetus/child?

Some women may find it difficult to cope with a new life being entirely their responsibility; should they be "punished" for not making the choice of having an abortion while the fetus/child was in the womb?
 
Retroactive abortions are awesome. We need to make it legal up to age 10 or so, just to get rid of annoying kids.
 
I don't get it, do you mean like euthanasia where the baby would be better dead, or when the baby itself is just 'unwanted'? If the former, then maybe. If it's the latter, then just put it in an adoption center, jeez...
 
(Can the mods please delete the last option and rename the second-to-last option "Yes, they should be allowed to terminate them any time.")
 
No, Do we really need to regress back to the barbarian states when they killed children?
 
No, I do believe that I would have to go to war over it.
 
If you don't want the kid, put it up for adoption. You had plenty of time to 'abort' the child before it was born, it's way too late after he/she actually is born.
 
You mean killing a baby once its been born, surely you cant be serious, and this is just a flame.
I know there is a reason why they wont terminate after a certain amount of time in the womb.
 
Considering that there is still some support for partial-birth abortions on this forum, what would you all think of post-birth abortions?

A post-birth abortion would be performed, of course, after the fetus/child is independently using all of its life functions.

Should their be a window after the fetus/child's birth for mothers to be able to terminate the life functions of that fetus/child?

Some women may find it difficult to cope with a new life being entirely their responsibility; should they be "punished" for not making the choice of having an abortion while the fetus/child was in the womb?


Boy and girls, pay attention. This is a textbook example of Ad nauseam argument.
:clap:

EDITED: to appease Sir Sharpe.
 
It perplexes me why people find this disturbing but find it acceptable to kill babies who have not seen the light of day. Yes, you can argue points and details all you want, but it will always confuse me.

Absolutely not.
 
If its a viable baby with out any sever disability I say no. You can always give a baby up. Most cities have spots you can dump a baby off no question. If its ******** and will be a burden on all the rest of the population I say killit if thats what the parents want. Not every life is worth saving and not every life is worth living.
 
Yes within 24 hours. Y it doesn't have human emotions feelings and other things that classify something as a human. I would of voted longer but im not sure at what age these traits come. So i don't want any emotional baby's dead.
 
Yes within 24 hours. Y it doesn't have human emotions feelings and other things that classify something as a human. I would of voted longer but im not sure at what age these traits come. So i don't want any emotional baby's dead.

Dude, are you serious? If you are that is seriously scary.
 
So first we have a thread about fantasizing to commit mass murder then a thread asking if its ok to murder babies and young children, whats next a thread asking if its ok to have sex and to torture young kids?

I been away for a while but i remember when even questioning another ones intellect would get you a warning, these forums have gone downhill a lot imo.
 
Babies' heads are bigger than their bodies, and they can't even talk. They can hardly be considered to be humans at that point.

Also, they are totally dependent on their parents for care, making the parents nothing more than slaves. We do not condone slavery in this society, so if the parents don't want to work for the child, they shouldn't have too. If noone will take the burden for them, abortion is the only way to go.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom