Lets cut it out entirely imo.
Lack of explicit denial in no way equals explicit acknowledgment.
So what ?
There is always going to be something that one has not explicitly acknowleged.
For instance: I dare say that he has not explicitly acknowledged that 57 + 312 = 369
So anyone who is part of a minority population should not be treated equally with the rest of society? Wow. How enlightened of you. Not.Society shouldn't bend over backwards to accommodate minorities, religious or otherwise.
Oh, please. I already explained that, so being willfully obtuse isn't going to lead anywhere positive.Then what is your complaint about King Charles III ?
Oh, please. I already explained that, so being willfully obtuse isn't going to lead anywhere positive.
I've got some bad news for you about that . . .I am sure that if there is another world war, if Charles II survives
Should society bend over backwards to help them and accommodate their customs? No.So anyone who is part of a minority population should not be treated equally with the rest of society? Wow. How enlightened of you. Not.
Everyone has religious beliefs, even if those beliefs are "there is no god", that is still a religious belief, just like everyone has a marital status, even children and other people who are unmarried and never were. Atheism is to a religious belief as single is to a marital status.Oh, please. I already explained that, so being willfully obtuse isn't going to lead anywhere positive.
You realize that ethnic and faith minorities aren't the only minorities, right? Disabled people are a minority, and I happen to be one of them. You'd better believe I insist on equal treatment and accommodation. My body might not work right, but I am no less a citizen because of that.Should society bend over backwards to help them and accommodate their customs? No.
Should they be driven out of the country by an angry, violent mob? Also, no.
Everyone has religious beliefs, even if those beliefs are "there is no god", that is still a religious belief, just like everyone has a marital status, even children and other people who are unmarried and never were. Atheism is to a religious belief as single is to a marital status.
It's pretty clear from both the context and my previously expressed viewpoints that I'm talking about people from foreign cultural and religious groups, not people in wheelchairs.You realize that ethnic and faith minorities aren't the only minorities, right? Disabled people are a minority, and I happen to be one of them. You'd better believe I insist on equal treatment and accommodation. My body might not work right, but I am no less a citizen because of that.
If atheism isn't a religious belief, than single isn't a marital status. Either you believe that God exists, that multiple gods exist, or that there is no God. All of those are beliefs.Don't even go to the notion that atheism is a religious belief. It isn't. Period, end of story, that way to purchase the t-shirts. You do not get to 'splain what I believe to me.
Actually, it isn't. Minority rights means any sort of minority, or at least it does here.It's pretty clear from both the context and my previously expressed viewpoints that I'm talking about people from foreign cultural and religious groups, not people in wheelchairs.
I suggest you read the red portion of my sig. Do NOT tell me what I do or don't believe. You do not have that right.If atheism isn't a religious belief, than single isn't a marital status. Either you believe that God exists, that multiple gods exist, or that there is no God. All of those are beliefs.
In North America, it seems to be a tyranny of the minority, where groups that make up less than 20% of the population can tear down historical statues, get all sorts of preferential treatment in hiring and admissions, etc...Actually, it isn't. Minority rights means any sort of minority, or at least it does here.
Fine, then I guess I don't have a marital status since I'm single.I suggest you read the red portion of my sig. Do NOT tell me what I do or don't believe. You do not have that right.
There are other threads for this kind of argument. Mind you, it will not go anywhere positive.
Should society bend over backwards to help them and accommodate their customs? No.