like I don't really know anything besides super basic mechanics maybe
I'll never be able to figure out something new that is true and like solidly found
Yeah, and so does everyone else.
At some level, this stuff gets so specialized, that you will not understand it, unless it's in your exact same field.
If I scroll through the latest newsletter of Science and Nature, and there is a research article which is not in my field, I'll not read it (news items yes, but not articles). Might not understand a bit. My field is microbiology (kinda). If there's stuff which has too much immunology or human genetics in it, I'll just skip it. Not worth wasting my time, I'll not understand half of it. Not even considering stuff which is further away.
So you're not special

.
You would hope that this stuff gets sorted out at some point by experts. But sometimes people are embarrassed to admit that they don't understand it. Or just bad publishing. Could be many things.
That you'd not have caught it means nothing

.
It actually shows more a (partially) broken system, unrelated to you.
For some more entertaining reads (I've only watched the first few minutes, Sokal and the Bogdanoffs), which are somewhat related, also check:
-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCIgen (and everything in the "see also" list)
-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_scholarly_publishing_hoaxes
-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Predatory_open-access_publishing