No, because you still need to wring them all out first.What happens if you remove all of the sponges from the ocean? Does the sea level rise?
No, because you still need to wring them all out first.What happens if you remove all of the sponges from the ocean? Does the sea level rise?
According to the behind-the-scenes information that's come out, Tina Louise was not really a very nice person, at least not to the fans. And for some reason she thought she was the star of the show, in spite of the name "Gilligan" in the title.[table=head]
Castaway|Reunion Specials|Status
Gilligan (Bob Denver)|Appeared|Deceased
The Skipper (Alan Hale Jr.)|Appeared|Deceased
Mr. Howell (Jim Backus)|Appeared|Deceased
Mrs. Howell (Natalie Schafer)|Appeared|Deceased
The Professor (Russell Johnson)|Appeared|Deceased
Mary Ann (Dawn Wells)|Appeared|Deceased
The Movie Star (Tina Louise)|Declined|Living
[/table]
Coincidence?
I didn't even know we had tables now.
Yes, I recall a story of Louise complaining to CBS executives only to have them ask her if she had seen the title of the show.According to the behind-the-scenes information that's come out, Tina Louise was not really a very nice person, at least not to the fans. And for some reason she thought she was the star of the show, in spite of the name "Gilligan" in the title.
The only actor I've met is Sylvester McCoy (the Seventh Doctor). I did meet a couple of Star Trek writers who had parts as extras in Star Trek: The Motion Picture and the DS9 episode "Trials and Tribble-ations" (Bjo Trimble and David Gerrold). I've heard that Gerrold could be cranky with some fans, but he was nice to me when we had a couple of minutes' chat at his autograph table.Yes, I recall a story of Louise complaining to CBS executives only to have them ask her if she had seen the title of the show.
Even during the show’s run though she wasn’t a big draw; Dawn Wells got on average three times as much fan mail.
I actually met Bob Denver once. I think by that time all the pot had fried his long-term memory, though.
In support of this thesis, I present a speech from 1998 railing against political correctness in the exact way that some rail against woke today. I will not link to it as it is hate filled fascism, but a search will find it:We have 3 terms, that have been used in very similar ways:
As you can see from the google ngams below, the peak usage of these words are roughly separated by 20 years. My hypothesis is that this is an example of the common phenomenon that what is cool for your parents is deeply uncool for you. Therefore if you do not like woke, you only have to wait a few years and it will be uncool.
- Right on
- Politically correct
- Woke
Spoiler Ngrams :![]()
![]()
![]()
William Lind is, among other things, a proponent of the theory of "Cultural Marxism." According to Wikipedia...The totalitarian nature of Political Correctness is revealed nowhere more clearly than on college campuses, many of which at this point are small ivy covered North Koreas, where the student or faculty member who dares to cross any of the lines set up by the gender feminist or the homosexual-rights activists, or the local black or Hispanic group, or any of the other sainted “victims” groups that PC revolves around, quickly find themselves in judicial trouble. Within the small legal system of the college, they face formal charges – some star-chamber proceeding – and punishment. That is a little look into the future that Political Correctness intends for the nation as a whole.
Wikipedia said:Cultural Marxism is a far-right antisemitic conspiracy theory which claims Western Marxism as the basis of continuing academic and intellectual efforts to subvert Western culture.[1][2][3] The conspiracists claim that an elite of Marxist theorists and Frankfurt School intellectuals are subverting Western society with a culture war that undermines the Christian values of traditionalist conservatism and promotes the cultural liberal values of the 1960s counterculture and multiculturalism, progressive politics and political correctness, misrepresented as identity politics created by critical theory.
Wikipedia said:The conspiracy theory of Marxist culture war is promoted by right-wing politicians, fundamentalist religious leaders, political commentators in mainstream print and television media and white supremacist terrorists.
Wikipedia said:In the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) report "Reframing the Enemy" (2003), Bill Berkowitz said that Lind was the principal promoter and popularizer of the Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory, which claims that a coterie of Jewish-German philosophers, the Frankfurt School, had seized control of American popular culture, and have been systematically subverting Christian churches and ethics within the U.S. The conspiracists’ preoccupation with the Jewishness of most Frankfurt School intellectuals is seen as confirming that Cultural Marxism is an antisemitic canard.[20] The SPLC reported that in 1999 Lind wrote, "The real damage to race relations in the South came, not from slavery, but [from] Reconstruction, which would not have occurred if the South had won [the civil war]."
I was about to say that this guy can't die soon enough, but obviously the damage has been done.Wikipedia said:The manifesto of Anders Breivik is built around Lind's theory on cultural Marxism and contains 27 pages taken directly from his writings.
Sounds like a sequel to The Turner Diaries.Wikipedia said:Fiction
Lind also wrote Victoria: A Novel of 4th Generation War, in which a group of "Christian Marines" leads an armed resistance against cultural Marxism as the American federal government collapses.
Sounds like Enver Hoxha's analysis of monarchy.Hey, does anybody remember the term "ZOG"? This 'cultural Marxism' thing sounds like that, but dressed in a suit and tie and pretending to be intellectual.
Without any context, I can see this making sense. One may be very good at managing the day to day operations of a team/company, which could be described as tactical leadership. One could also be good at visualising where the team/company should be in the medium to long term, and positioning them to achieve that. This could be described as strategic leadership."We are excited to have an executive with Aaron's strategic leadership abilities ...”
Read off a PR thing. I emphasized the word strategic because if I’m not sure if I should infer that there is an ability in un-strategic leadership and what that would entail.
Without any context, I can see this making sense. One may be very good at managing the day to day operations of a team/company, which could be described as tactical leadership. One could also be good at visualising where the team/company should be in the medium to long term, and positioning them to achieve that. This could be described as strategic leadership.
Does that make sense? Would not hypostrategic mean "less strategic", whereas hyperstrategic would mean more strategic?Going by that, the hypostrategic (neologism I have seen used a lot with military stuff; eg an airplane capable of hitting you with missiles from half the globe away is hypostrategic, while the usual long-range missile is strategic) leadership of a company should be seeing past an actual end of this era ^_^
Does that make sense? Would not hypostrategic mean "less strategic", whereas hyperstrategic would mean more strategic?
Do not get me started on why we use greek for these prefixes, as in english at least they are close to indistinguishable. I bet people have died because someone misheard hyperglycemic as hypoglycemic or some such term.