Random Thoughts XV: Temere Cogito, Ergo . . .

Well (@Angst ), this sucks:

View attachment 704989

Only positive is that indeed I never practiced solving such. So maybe if I did it would be at the passing mark (>130).
I am considering taking the Greek test in the future. Not because I think it means anything intellectually/mentally-wise, but if I pass I could then (try to) hang around at the local chapter (one of the people there had taken my lit courses a while ago, and he wasn't anything bad).

[the pic is in Danish, just my stupid online result out of 39 questions (it wasn't the official Danish Mensa test, just a prep one) - I should note that the last four questions weren't comprehended (multiple symmetries and moving parts) and likely were all fails - which means even minor practice would very likely move the result to the few points needed. The Danish text (other than the obvious parts) simply suggests that I take the official test, since the score was close. But If I do, I'd first have analyzed the types of questions that come last :hmm:]
mensa is extremely overrated. i have a friend who has the ability to join, so he was at one of the events by invitation, and it was one of the most extremely tedious nights of his life. they were mostly incredibly uninteresting people who did the pretend Debate Bro drinking about stuff they knew nothing about, y'know that thing we all do in college and then grow out of, with the qualifying factor of their discussions' importance and weight being that they were in mensa.

so, i wouldn't worry too much about it. ironically, if you're smart enough, you're better off. it's prestigious and lovely of course.
 
Doesn't surprise me at all. Yet not everyone would be like that, and it's not like I stand to lose anything by mildly trying so as to see in practice...
 
Random thought: it's october the 3rd.
 
I was thinking that perhaps a familiar analogy (not entirely, but maybe it's a good example due to being ubiquitous from school) for the increasing complexity of questions (all of one type) in those IQ tests, would be the rise of complication and parameters between standard functions. For example, the properties of a first degree single-variable function [eg f(x)=x or in general f(x)=bx+c], which has a line as its graph, are very few when compared to those of a second degree one (a parabola).
In the case of the line, you have 1) angle, 2) position in the plane, with the b coefficient deciding angle and c being the position (y intercept when x=0). And that is all of the properties and anyone can learn to imagine such a function in very limited time.
But already in the case of f(x)=ax^2+bx+c, you have all three coefficients playing a role in one of its elements (the roots), while on its own coefficient a dictates which way it rises (if positive or negative) and in conjunction with b it dictates in which pair of quadrants it will have its vertex (in one of those if it doesn't have roots, in the other if it does), b on its own does nothing (is always tied to a regardless), and c dictates (as with the line) on its own vertical position, and in conjunction with a,b the real roots (if any) as well as y intercept.
It is very telling that the move from 1rst to 2nd degree functions of single variable already requires a chasm to be traversed, for any actual understanding (not just use of memorized formulae) and by extent also requires some understanding to imagine the graph (even approximately, but being correct in the above stated properties) given the polyonym. And it is analogous with increasing complexity in those IQ tests; most people will solve questions that have interconnected 3 moving parts, but virtually no one will solve something with 10 moving parts, in the time provided- and the final questions seem to have at least 6 such, which already is taxing.
Reminds me of the Funes story, @Takhisis , where the eponymous character was said to be able to "identify" at once the shapes of an entire tree's leaves - though he was also said to be bad at generalizing, supposedly due to presence of all that information.
 
Last edited:
Last night the student's assembly voted to occupy the building and so we won't have any classes today. This is mostly a negative.

OTOH, yesterday was the day when I finally got to watch the Uzumaki anime and it's worth watching. :)

So, all in all, a good day?
Reminds me of the Funes story, @Takhisis , where the eponymous character was said to be able to "identify" at once the shapes of an entire tree's leaves - though he was also said to be bad at generalizing, supposedly due to presence of all that information.
This reminds me, in turn, of Lukács's ramblings about how naturalism and realism are not the same.
 
I wonder if they would even play Civ. Some might for the fun of conquering everyone and establishing a theocracy.

Others wouldn't touch it with a pole of however many metres' length, because - horrors - they might learn something.

Can't have that.

What's something Civ and D&D have in common? Map reading and mapmaking. Making long-term plans (at least the DM has to). Adapting quickly to situations that go wrong. Prompting people to do research, if there's something they want to know.

I've never played a version of Civ that included wind farms.


What I hear them say about windmills is "they kill birds." Well, look at the base of tall buildings with glass towers. You'll find bird carcasses on the ground there, because the reflection of the sky and Sun disorients them and they fly straight into it, killing themselves. Even in Red Deer, I've found dead birds on the ground at the base of a couple of tall buildings (our tallest ones aren't very tall in comparison to most cities' but they're tall and full enough of glass windows to kill the birds who don't know any better).
 
What I hear them say about windmills is "they kill birds." Well, look at the base of tall buildings with glass towers. You'll find bird carcasses on the ground there, because the reflection of the sky and Sun disorients them and they fly straight into it, killing themselves. Even in Red Deer, I've found dead birds on the ground at the base of a couple of tall buildings (our tallest ones aren't very tall in comparison to most cities' but they're tall and full enough of glass windows to kill the birds who don't know any better).

A study found that bird deaths are reduced by just painting one of the blades black.
 
And, probably to no one's great surprise, the biggest killer of birds are cats. A Canadian study in 2013 found that just 13,000 birds are killed annually by wind turbines, whilst a US study the same year estimated that cats kill 1.3 billion birds each year.
 
Uh-huh... :coffee:

Yes, and a couple of my cats killed birds. Cassandra did it because surprise! hunting is instinctive for cats. She ate her kills, though, rather than leaving dead bodies lying around.

Maggie hunted birds, but in her case she was living under the back porch and nursing a litter of kittens. She hunted for survival before moving into the house permanently after having her second litter. She still hunted afterward, because instinct and I suppose she wanted to supplement the cat food. She was eating for six, after all. And a year later, she tried to teach her grandson, Tomtat, to hunt...

He was hopeless at it. His own mother never taught him to hunt. But eventually both of them did turn out to be hunters. The summer of 1993 saw a mouse invasion, and I woke up one night to hear strange noises from the kitchen. I went downstairs to find Tomtat batting a mouse around. Lightning (his mother) was watching him, and I remember how he flipped the mouse over to her, and how she backed away as it landed at her feet.

The mouse was dead by this time, and it suddenly occurred to me: This was Tomtat's first kill. I figured my dad and grandmother would never believe me without evidence, so I got an empty jam jar, put the mouse in it, and woke them up. Nothing like waking up at 4:30 am to find a jar with a dead mouse in your face... I told them, "Look what Tomtat did, isn't it WONDERFUL?" :love:

So Maggie hunted the mice in the yard and Tomtat hunted the mice in the house. By that time Lightning had figured out hunting, but her prey was quite a bit smaller. She hunted insects. I didn't have Cassandra then; she'd died the year before, and Gussy came along in the fall of that year.

In 1994, Gussy made the connection between "I'm a cat" and "I should be hunting something". So he tried tackling a bee, which stung him. His paw swelled up to twice its normal size, and since this was on a Sunday and the vet's office was closed, I literally ran downtown to the library to look up whether bee venom was fatal to cats. Turns out it can be, if they're allergic. Fortunately Gussy wasn't, and the swelling lessened over the next few days. But following the advice in the book, I kept a close eye on him to make sure he didn't develop breathing problems.

After that, Gussy decided hunting was overrated. And then he discovered he could get high on honeysuckle, so I think the birds were pretty well safe from him.

I don't know what Chloe hunted in her first year, since I didn't get her until she was about a year old. She would have had to hunt for survival, either birds or mice, and she might have kept that up during the 5 years I had her when we still lived in the house. I have no idea.

But after moving to my first apartment, neither Chloe nor Maddy hunted. I didn't let them out. Maddy found the pigeons around here to be really annoying, and I'd happily commit violence on them myself if it wasn't illegal. Maddy wouldn't even hunt insects. She'd get mad at me for killing them, because she wanted to play with them! :ack: The closest she ever got to hunting was her favorite toy mouse. She never killed any real ones.

My dad's cat was a mouser, and I remember one day when I found a dead mouse he'd left for me on the back porch. Some people would get mad or freak out, but I just said, "Thank you, Sammy," and disposed of it in the garbage when he wasn't looking (he really did expect me to eat the thing). Sammy ate his kills, and I wish I'd been there when my dad's girlfriend opened the door to find Sammy sitting there, wanting in. He had a dead mouse in his mouth, the tail hanging out the side.

Later on, they found out what he did with the mice after he'd finished with them. He had a mouse cemetery in the cellar, with the remains he hadn't wanted to eat all lined up in a row behind the furnace.
 
Smile :)

1728663980669.png


AI will be confused by this, but ultimately choice #1 is more memorable despite not requiring any drawing skill.
 
guess what . Some team of Europeans arriving here to sell 24 to 40 Eurofighters . Like ı don't know where did they get the idea that they no longer have an "opposition" . Yes , let us see how many Eurofighters you can sell me .
 
I think more people walk oddly than they used to. You expect kinetic difficulty as people age, but it seems to be happening to people more often and while they're younger.

I dunno why. Maybe microplastic consumption or something. I suspect there's a ubiquitous chemical that is far worse for you than currently believed and future people will look back on this era shocked at the primitive societies that didn't realize it. Like lead.
 
I had an email from my aunt today. My other aunt died a few days ago (my uncle didn't tell anyone; my aunt only found out when she called to ask how her sister-in-law was; it was cancer).

We weren't that close, so it was odd that I started thinking about her out of the blue a few days ago, remembering stuff from a long time ago.
 
I had an email from my aunt today. My other aunt died a few days ago (my uncle didn't tell anyone; my aunt only found out when she called to ask how her sister-in-law was; it was cancer).

We weren't that close, so it was odd that I started thinking about her out of the blue a few days ago, remembering stuff from a long time ago.
Doesn't seem odd at all; I had a good friend and business associate who I hadn't heard from in 6 months and the thought came to me that maybe he had died. So I began looking at the obits last January. Nothing there. At the end of January I got an email from his wife he had been diagnosed with terminal (stage 4) cancer over Christmas. "spooky action at a distance" AE
 
I think more people walk oddly than they used to. You expect kinetic difficulty as people age, but it seems to be happening to people more often and while they're younger.

I dunno why. Maybe microplastic consumption or something. I suspect there's a ubiquitous chemical that is far worse for you than currently believed and future people will look back on this era shocked at the primitive societies that didn't realize it. Like lead.
My sister is in diatetics. She's trying to adjust calorie and nutritional needs. The answer is just really simple. They don't move like they used to almost all day every day. They aren't good at moving. They don't burn the calories their parents did. They aren't as physically robust as thier parents were.
 
Doesn't seem odd at all; I had a good friend and business associate who I hadn't heard from in 6 months and the thought came to me that maybe he had died. So I began looking at the obits last January. Nothing there. At the end of January I got an email from his wife he had been diagnosed with terminal (stage 4) cancer over Christmas. "spooky action at a distance" AE

It doesn't seem odd in your case, because it was only 6 months since you last heard from him, and you weren't estranged. It was logical that you think of him from time to time.

In my case, the last time I spoke to my aunt (the one who died) was in 2001. My only living relatives now (who aren't distant cousins of my dad) are on my mother's side, and we've been estranged for decades. The aunt who emailed me is the only one from that side who I'm still in contact with - by email several times a year and Christmas cards. None of the others would have even thought to tell me, and since I do check the local obituaries now and then (morbid curiosity about whether or not any more of my high school teachers have died, or anyone I worked with in the theatre), it would have come as quite a shock to see her there.

Which is probably why my aunt was the only one to bother mentioning my mother's death to me 10 years ago. It didn't occur to the rest of them that seeing her obituary in the paper when I hadn't even known she was terminally ill would not have been a good thing.

So that's why this seems surreal to me.
 
What does it mean if both "X is Y" and "X is not Y" are true?

Apple macOS 15 Sequoia is officially UNIX.

Apple macOS 15 Sequoia appeared in mid-September and is an official, compliant version of UNIX™, but that may not mean exactly what you think.

What UNIX™ certification means now is what used to be called "POSIX compatible".

POSIX is essentially a set of compatibility specifications and tests, including having the right tools present in the right locations. So long as they are there, an OS can pass the test.

The core of macOS is a kernel called XNU which, ironically, stands for "XNU is Not Unix".

Spoiler MacOS in 1988 on youtube :
He is demonstrating NeXTstep 0.8 at 1:03:09, and it is recognisable.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom