amadeus
Serenity now
A hell of a lot of good her security detail was, right?Todays pet peeve: People who don't read the OP.
A hell of a lot of good her security detail was, right?Todays pet peeve: People who don't read the OP.
We should only send large ugly men to dangerous and hostile places. Pretty women should stay at home and look nice for us on TV.
I think it is part of that mindset that women cause the problem by not acting and dressing modestly, and not even wearing facial coverings so that men aren't overly attracted to them.
I'm going to go off on a limb here, and get flamed pretty heavily for it I suppose.
What if she's faking it? I know, I know, I suggested the same thing with the Duke rape case, and everyone said I was crazy. Women would never fake rape. Yes I know this woman is a respected reporter, not some two-bit stripper. But I figure there is the possibility she's faking it to "create" news. I was appalled at Fox news creating news by the beating of their team in Egypt. Yes it actually happened, but that doesn't mean you need to report it over and over. Fox news is shameless sometimes. So maybe she decided to one-up fox news.
I just don't buy her reason for not going to an Egyptian hospital, so I don't trust her story. I'm sorry if that makes me a bad person. So be it. I generally don't trust people until I get to know them.
Thats the thing, the fact that she had a security detail shows that not only was the dangerous circumstances recognized, but then it being overwhelmed should prove that this is not some happy go lucky carnival atmosphere like many pretend. This sexual assault is small potatoes compared to the MURDERS that have taken place.
That is not some judgment on some antidemocratic mentality, its a judgment of the inherent violence of emotionally charged mobs an unstable political environments. This happens often, around the world. She exposed herself to violence in general, not sexual assault in particular, as as calculated risk. And whether you think it fair or not, women are generally at greater risk as targets of violence in general.
The real question is whether she was attacked because she was a women, or was she attacked because she was a nosy western reporter and then sexually assaulted because the opportunity presented itself. I have a hard time believing that a cable of sexual charged men spontaneously overcame a group of professional bodyguards for the sole purpose of sexual assaulting this particular person. There were plenty of other women in the crowd.
I would not, however, be surprised that after she was overwhelmed by the crowd individuals would take the opportunity to get their sexual deviance in. Unfortunately that is all to predictable at that point, especially in Egypt.
I'm going to go off on a limb here, and get flamed pretty heavily for it I suppose.
What if she's faking it? I know, I know, I suggested the same thing with the Duke rape case, and everyone said I was crazy. Women would never fake rape. Yes I know this woman is a respected reporter, not some two-bit stripper. But I figure there is the possibility she's faking it to "create" news. I was appalled at Fox news creating news by the beating of their team in Egypt. Yes it actually happened, but that doesn't mean you need to report it over and over. Fox news is shameless sometimes. So maybe she decided to one-up fox news.
I just don't buy her reason for not going to an Egyptian hospital, so I don't trust her story. I'm sorry if that makes me a bad person. So be it. I generally don't trust people until I get to know them.
It is an excellent example of sexually repressed Catholics getting drunk and groping women without their permission. It just goes to show how absurd it is to try to use this incident to vilify and condemn Muslims or Arabs, much less insinuating that the victim was partly responsible for merely being there.Mardi Gras is a good example.
A hell of a lot of good her security detail was, right?
You mean your bigoted strawman of my actual opinions?Your bigoted characterization of Mardi Gras sexual violations being a result of Catholic sexual repression is unsupported by any facts.
[Mardi Gras] is an excellent example of sexually repressed Catholics getting drunk and groping women without their permission. It just goes to show how absurd it is to try to use this incident to vilify and condemn Muslims or Arabs, much less insinuating that the victim was partly responsible for merely being there.
You mean you bigoted strawman of my actual opinions?
Do you actually deny that many Catholics aren't sexually repressed?
you mean your accurate characterization of my actual opinions?
And you apparently still don't have a clue what my actual opinions are.