billw2015
King
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2015
- Messages
- 837
I will try and set up a Win 7 VM for testing, seems like loads of people here on old OS.Ah so looks like its esoteric Windows 7 memory management problem again
Single Player bugs and crashes v39 plus (SVN) - After the 20th of July 2019
- Thread starter Thunderbrd
- Start date
Here is save and minidump on latest assets.
I managed to pass turn on Windows XP compatibility.
I could pass turn after that without any compatibility mode, but got this python error.
Code:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "BugEventManager", line 308, in _handleDefaultEvent
File "CvEventManager", line 1306, in onBuildingBuilt
UnboundLocalError: local variable 'CyTeamX' referenced before assignmentLooks like that python error was something independent though.
Last edited:
Looks like you don't have MAX_YIELD_STACK set to 10. It's in globalDefines.xml.The current yields display is not right. The hover over shows 2and 4
but the yield shows two loves, 2 slices of bread and the number 5. A loaf usually represents 5 slices iirc.
Fixed in 10998
Last edited:
Stimpified
Chieftain
Updated from SVN 10986 to 10996. One screen paralysis. Cleared cache, started again and CTD upon End Turn.
Update again.
Upload save and minidump.
Lord Peter Wimsey
Chieftain
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2019
- Messages
- 6
Greetings,
I have an issue relating to map sizes:
When I start a new game, I can select one of the size options as usual. I always chose "Giant" or "Gigantic".
However, ingame the map size always resets to Large or (occasionally) Huge size in regards to actual tile count. My comparison are the numbers from here: https://forums.civfanatics.com/threads/v39-changelog.647927/#post-15499478
Here is a screenshot of the issue ingame:
As you can see, it states "Giant" as the mapsize as I have chosen, but the actual tile value is lower and corresponds to (132x88=11616) Large.
I'm currently on the newest SVN (revision #10999), but I had the same issue with a slightly older SVN version (couldn't report back then due to registration issues at this site here) as well as the V39 "normal" download. Running from Steam but with "original" Beyond the Swords 3.19 patch, with administrator rights.
I've also tested with both C2C_PerfectWorld2f as well as C2C_World mapscripts, and I suspect it might affect other mapscripts (even though my coding knowledge is far too limited to spot issues directly in the python).
I also considered this to just be a display issue, so I also opened up the world editor and counted the tiles (vertically) by hand, and indeed they amounted to 88, so the map was indeed too small.
So, I hope you folks can figure out what the issue might be here. Frankly I'm a little worried as it does only seem to affect me - or did it just go by unnoticed?
I have an issue relating to map sizes:
When I start a new game, I can select one of the size options as usual. I always chose "Giant" or "Gigantic".
However, ingame the map size always resets to Large or (occasionally) Huge size in regards to actual tile count. My comparison are the numbers from here: https://forums.civfanatics.com/threads/v39-changelog.647927/#post-15499478
Spoiler World Map Sizes as of V39 :
Here is a screenshot of the issue ingame:
As you can see, it states "Giant" as the mapsize as I have chosen, but the actual tile value is lower and corresponds to (132x88=11616) Large.
I'm currently on the newest SVN (revision #10999), but I had the same issue with a slightly older SVN version (couldn't report back then due to registration issues at this site here) as well as the V39 "normal" download. Running from Steam but with "original" Beyond the Swords 3.19 patch, with administrator rights.
I've also tested with both C2C_PerfectWorld2f as well as C2C_World mapscripts, and I suspect it might affect other mapscripts (even though my coding knowledge is far too limited to spot issues directly in the python).
I also considered this to just be a display issue, so I also opened up the world editor and counted the tiles (vertically) by hand, and indeed they amounted to 88, so the map was indeed too small.
So, I hope you folks can figure out what the issue might be here. Frankly I'm a little worried as it does only seem to affect me - or did it just go by unnoticed?
Dancing Hoskuld
Deity
I may have missed that. I usually don't just copy that file into my gaming folder since I like my spawn rates different to everyone else.
edit yes that fixed it
Last edited:
billw2015
King
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2015
- Messages
- 837
I thought this was recommended to always be used on Win 7/Vista?
Someone copied wrong thing here - it was previous resizing, that got changed.
Actual size changes are:
Size rescaling:
Duel - 960 -> 1536
Tiny - 1664 -> 3456
Small - 2560 -> 4704
Standard - 4368 -> 6144
Large - 6656 -> 7776
Huge - 10240 -> 9600
Giant - 16000 -> 11616
Gigantic - 24000 -> 13824
Maps are now smaller.
Scenarios have updated size tag.
So Large and smaller maps are bigger, and Huge and larger maps are smaller.
That is someone used sizes of SVN 10307 not 10447 in this log.
It is recommended only in case of crashes, otherwise it slows down game.
billw2015
King
- Joined
- Jun 22, 2015
- Messages
- 837
This is the slowest save I have seen so far so thanks for that!
However no crash at end of turn on latest.
How much does it slow it down? If it isn't noticeably slower then the advice should just be to always use XP compat even if it does technically slow it down.
Pedia is definitely much slower.
So I guess python related stuff works slower.
TaylorItaly
Prince
But only 2-3 Seconds more at EoT and the Pedia is about 1 Second longer to load,but that is minimal.
I guess you have faster CPU and memory, for me compatibility mode is only to circumvent bugs.
Lord Peter Wimsey
Chieftain
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2019
- Messages
- 6
Ah, okay that explains that. Thanks!
Lord Peter Wimsey
Chieftain
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2019
- Messages
- 6
... sadly, now I have another bug.
Affects both the previous (#10999) as well as the current #11003 revision.
Basically I can't access the city building queue:
Instead of the usual stuff, I can only spot a single black and white pixel. The buildings build fine, and I can chose a new one via the popup once the old one has finished.
Another screenshot:
Or maybe I'm just too dumb to spot it, or the queue was moved elsewhere... sorry to bother you again.
Affects both the previous (#10999) as well as the current #11003 revision.
Basically I can't access the city building queue:
Instead of the usual stuff, I can only spot a single black and white pixel. The buildings build fine, and I can chose a new one via the popup once the old one has finished.
Another screenshot:
Or maybe I'm just too dumb to spot it, or the queue was moved elsewhere... sorry to bother you again.
Did you delete UserSettings folder?
PPIO was merged in SVN 10722
Mod can't be in my documents and must be named Caveman2Cosmos
Delete the userSettings folder. Only needs to be done once, new userSettings files generated after that should be in the correct format.
Hello. Please tell me they changed something in the AI of units? After the update 1-2 months units in order to patrol do not behave as before:they're not detached far from the border and was treated immediately,and now,if the border there is an enemy they attack it and then not go on patrol and kill anyone you can cease the treatment,acting like berserks. In other cases, they behave as before.
There's a bunch of BUG options to influence how the "Automate border control" thingy behaves.
Similar threads
- Sticky
- Sticky
