salty mud
Deity
I think you're both gonna be terribly disappointed...
How do you know?
I think you're both gonna be terribly disappointed...
He said he thinks, not knows.
I'm not a fan of the "teleport to somewhere" DLC. 4 times out of 5 it feels tacked on and I wonder what the heck my character would want to go there for (only one of the DLCs for Fallout 3 was any good, out of 5, in my opinion, and that's because the area that was tacked on was substantial enough that almost a whole game could be made in it). I find they often clash with the original setting of the game which made that game great.
My favorite type of DLC would be some that add a lot of new enemies, and equipment types, and spells into the already existing world. And by that I mean 10-15$ for a lot of those things (dozens or armors and weapons and enemies and spells), not 2$ for one type of armor, which is ridiculous. As for expanding the world, I'd prefer if they added dungeons or hidden places already within the existing world.
In other news; this week is going to be very long![]()
Any word on whether this game has been dumbed down/streamlined on the PC in order to satisfy the console version or is the PC version significantly different/better?
You know Thormodr, I tend to agree with many of your points of view on this matter of dumbing down, but I don't know if you realize how many threads you've posted exactly the same sentence almost to the word in, be it about Civ 5, Diablo III, or Elder Scrolls V. It's starting to be a little redundant, and since nobody has played Skyrim yet, your question seems painfully hostile and rhetorical.
We don't know, we'll see, previews of the game are highly positive, but everybody is now stupid and corrupted by having played consoles right.