~Darkening~
Weep, Mother.
Nice. The map was pretty much followed, through I didn't expect quite as much expansion on the Kongo
.

The eastern coast of the oversized atoll Australia has been successfully mapped by the Dutch East India Company.
(VOC: +ability to colonize Australia)
Colonization does not work that way!
Were my orders too late then?
@darkening, ahh, much of that land you have taken is not really under your control persay, so much as you have a legitimate claim and so it's being colored in your color If that makes sense.
OOC: England was capable of putting together expeditions to the Carabiean- why is it so much harder for Sweden?
OOC: England was capable of putting together expeditions to the Carabiean- why is it so much harder for Sweden?
From King Erik XV
To Riksdag
I am rightful king, and you have no rightful authority. I remind you that you accepted in 1527 the modifications of Gustav I. What a King can modify, a King can abolish. However, under the circumstances, I am willing to give you some concessions to ensure the orderly running of the state, and propose the following deal:
-The Riksdag will be given complete control of administration, laws and taxation
-The King will be given complete control over matters of war
-We will return to a system of royal selection by Parliament for the time being
Erhm....'OOC'.
Anyone want to take a bet on when and who takes out Sweden? Step up, step up! C'mon, let me hear 'em! Good pay out, I swear.
To the American Rebels
From the Kingdom of Great Britain
Wow, just wow. You took Boston from some ragtag Colonial soldiers. I must praise your superior leadership. Now let us see you retake Charleston from British regulars, and if you succeed, just maybe we will consider withdrawing from the war.
So in ending, I again applaud your seemingly fantastic battle for Boston, was it really that hard to take? I mean we are talking about militia here....
To: Sweden
From: Spain
Jesus treated with the Romans. Thomas treated with the Indians. Justinian treated with the Arabs. Richard treated with Saladin. Luther himself treated with the Church. And yet you will take a doctrinal matter so far?
Are you a servant of Christ, or the devil, that you should sow seeds of dissension through Christendom?
Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers: for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness?
Where, in the phrase "normalization of relations" or its equivalent "reopening of relations" does "alliance" appear? To refuse to speak with every Catholic nation on Earth closes an awful lot of doors. You might not want alliance, but a regular dialogue between nations is pragmatic and sensible.In the third and fourth, it was a matter of making peace, not a matter of alliance.
Things that happened a century ago don't qualify as "typical of our age". And the partition of Spanish territories in Italy had nothing to do with what the Spanish wanted.Neverwonagame3 said:Presumably you would accept that such behavior was exhibited with the partition of your own terrortories in the Netherlands and Italy at the least. Do you or do you not deny that such is typical of our age?