Suggestions and requests

Oh.I didn't see the year.

 

But in my games,Turks are too powerful,china never reborn(making Korea and Tibet controlling china.),France almost controls Europe in medieval,Incas NEVER collapse,Spain Britain,France and Portugal never settles lots of cities in the new world and Persia and Arabia do not control their historical empire.

EDIT:is there a in game picture taker???

 

Wow, with the exception of France controlling Europe, I have the EXACT opposite problems.

 

Print screen

 

Hey guys i have an idea.
What about some civilization start which civics that they don't have the tech (example:Roman republic starting with representation or Persia starting with secularism.)
And sometimes you will receive certain events depending to current year (even if you don't have the certain tech) or sometimes randomly to change your civics (requires the required tech) or face consequences.
A historical example:It is guaranteed the the Nazis will rise and Hitler will come to power.

Option 1: Ban the party
Effects: Unhappiness +2 for 10 turns

Option 2:Let them become power
Effect: Switch to autocracy,totalitarianism,fanaticism,and imperialism.

A random example:The #Countries dominate religion # Are brainwashing are people for us to become from a #current government and religion civics# to a fanaticism theocracy

Option 1:That will be great!
Effect:Change to theocracy and fanaticism.

Option 2:Those people!
Effect:Get two turns anarchy.

Option 3: Punish them by doing the opposite and force them among people.
Effect: Switch too Secularism and totalitarianism.

 

Only historical ones are like that
EDIT:Never mind

 

Actually it might be a good idea to make 'revolution' a completely automatic thing. Civic changes don't create anarchy unless there is cause for the same. And if you don't change a civic enough number of people want, it would automatically trigger a revolution and make you change to that civic whether the player likes it or not. This will be more challenging to a gamer, than just 'chosing' (like a god ) how the civ will evolve.

 

I don't like the idea of forced civic changes (or really forced anything). It's better if you have a choice between a revolution and some malus so that you don't feel arbitrarily forced into stuff (which is rarely liked or a good thing). I think Leoreth's solution is fine.

 

But (for me) that's the fun of the game...

 

I like this idea too. Thing is if we're trying to move towards a history simulator, then we should make the idea of civic changes and revolutions more realistic. This idea of your's Leoreth balances both worlds perfectly.

 

I think a plus 2 anarchy is better.

 

America with 1700AD start
viceroy, epic, svn revision 725 or so

infantry and machine guns in 1820's

I assume the AI tech-speed is way too fast, especially on the slower game speeds

I had a similar problem playing argentina..
spain had destroyers and infantry around 1840 there too..
monarch, epic speed

i think it's mostly the dutch, british and spanish are the ones going too fast in the 1700 scenario, probably due to their empires and the great income they receive from them

could the tech rate be modified in some way?

 

I want some help with modding . For my India game, I want to make the Mughal spawn conditional upon the Seljuks controlling Afghanistan. How would I remove the Mughals in case I succeed in keeping the Seljuks out ? Which file do I modify ? Also is there a way to get rid of the forced vassal caps ?

 

I forgot where the thread is, could you link it please . I haven't been on the DOC thread for a while now.

 

Modmodding Q&A Thread

 

Now that internet is not expensive and paid by the hour somewhere which is a 25 minute drive away, I will do a little follow-up on this post.

As citis pointed out in the Bugs thread, large cores make civilizations immortal. Same with cores which encompass all of the cities for a civilization. I will start a thread on core area reform soon.

The numbers for this ought to be different for the AI and the human, simply because AI collapses are an essential part of the game and human ones almost assuredly end it, or at least any sort of fun.

I think something like this would be reasonable:
If stability is below -40: AI collapses after 2 consecutive turns, human after 5.
If stability is below -20: AI collapses after 5 consecutive turns, human after 20.
If stability is below 0: AI collapses after 25 consecutive turns, human after 250.