On Arlette Desrosiers and Murder
by Frederick Otto Brahm II, Voice of the People
My father, the great man credited by many with speaking the truth of God that united Germany and expelled its demons, was very clear on the subject of violence, or, as some would have it called, “murder” implemented against the demonic, Communist, and liberal. Many of his vocal critics-- critics, also, of morality itself, as one will usually find under any serious prejudice-- attempted to indict him as personally responsible for the events of the reunification that took place throughout the 2020s and 2030s. I seek, here, to use his established absolution as a testimony in support of the actions of the Frenchwoman Arlette Desrosiers.
Firstly, a definition: murder is between people. When one human person kills another, we call it murder. The civil war of the 20s included a great volume of murder, this is true, and it has never been argued; the Leftist partisans who made battle in the streets and in the fields of Germany incited plentiful violence and, indeed, murder, human-on-human killing. The Christian militias that would reinstate order throughout the nation later are guilty of some killing as well, due to the necessities of the war, and surely their judgement by God will resolve their consciences when necessary.
This is because God condemns murder. It is prohibited as one of the Ten Commandments, and wrath as a Deadly Sin. It is certain that, during the war, many members of the Christian militias were guilty of murder, and that after this life they will be punished or forgiven accordingly. Of course, given the circumstances, by which human beings, Communists and liberals, were guarding the inhuman and refusing to listen to the heavenly reason to persuade them, as well as violently resisting the actions of God on earth by His soldiers, perhaps these necessary murders will be forgiven that they have preserved the souls of millions more than they destroyed.
But the killing of demonic creatures, such as those sponsored by the devil-collaborators in Agontrov, should not and cannot logically be called murder, by the simple logical reason that they are non-human. Whether or not they were human once is inconclusive in the research of the state scientists, but whether they are human now is unanimously agreed on: they are not. They are at best an abstraction of God’s image, the origin of the human form, and at worst something else entirely, likely outside of God’s kingdom. The leading theological hypotheses to their genesis are that their disfigurement is a curse or a mark to punish and identify the sinful, or that they are here as spawns of the devil, to deceive and cause condemnation among the pious or ignorant human people of earth. Regardless of the reality, they are not human, biologically or theologically.
For this reason, Arlette Desrosiers and her gang-- an amateur militia, of sorts-- are exempt from the cries of murder. Perhaps their judgement was short, and the “orcish” civilians they killed were still capable of cleansing and salvation, a question still unanswered by the experiments of the state scientists in Germany, but they are not guilty of murder. At worst, their crime is the expedition of a sentence not theirs to enforce, but an inevitable one nonetheless. At best, their crime is no crime at all but rather the work of God Himself in expelling demons, sanctioned by divinity and exempt from earthly reason.
Secondly, a much shorter reality: Arlette herself is guilty only of the actions she pulled the triggers to enact herself. At the age of 15, she is older than the Virgin Mary was at the time of Christ’s birth, and is therefore guilty of her own choices, but simply due to her charisma and leadership she must not be convicted of the actions of those she led. My father killed no one, he only exposed what he saw as the truth, and the choices of the Christian militias and soldiers of God were theirs to make, and theirs to claim responsibility for.