Agarwaen
King
So, anyone knows what the Turks responded? Are there angry turks on the street calling for actions against Syria like happened against Israel?
There's no official confirmation. It might have been an accident.
BBC BREAKING NEWS:
Turkey says it believes Syria shot down one of its military jets near their common border
I hope it was an accident plane or pilot wise, how stupid would Syria be to be shooting at anything in the air over the Mediterranean?
So, anyone knows what the Turks responded? Are there angry turks on the street calling for actions against Syria like happened against Israel?
Turkey doesn't have to respond.
Everybody knows what they think about Assad.
Syrian military says it downed Turkish fighter jet
The Syrian military has said it shot down a Turkish plane "flying in airspace over Syrian waters", according to state-run news agency Sana.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-18561219
So Syria has claimed it. Technically, Syria has the right to shoot down planes in her airspace if they were indeed violating it, but in her current circumstance, she should have tried to intercept and ground the plane or order it to turn back then fire first, ask questions later.
That's a remarkably stupid thing to have done. Their most powerful immediate neighbor is deeply unhappy with them, so they piss them off even more.
They don't need to respond by war, but if they believe it was the Syrian army that shoot down their jet, they can at least demand apologies.
Isn't Turkey a member of NATO as well? I'm interested to how this will affect the current deadlock between Russia and the West over sanctions.
http://www.odin.tc/news/read.asp?articleID=992During a briefing in Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs in the afternoon June 21 it was said that Russian freighter Alaed is now sailing to Murmansk port, Barents sea, to change the flag from Curacao to Russian, and then the vessel will resume its original voyage. Thats a very serious statement, firstly, because Russia officially confirmed the involvement in the Alaed incident, and secondly, because Russia openly challenged the Western ban on arms supply to Syria. If Western navies would try to stop m/v Alaed sailing under Russian flag, such an act may be considered by Russia as a hostile act, violating international maritime laws and Russias right to supply to Syria whatever Russia has to under previously achieved agreements. Legally Russia is in full right to ship anything to Syrian government, as long as there is no UN ban, recognized as compulsory by all the international community. Russias determination to ship the helicopters by no other means, but by m/v Alaed seems to be rather odd, is it just a belligerence or is such a headlong stubbornness fuelled by some kind of power play in high places, or maybe by somebodys strong interest?
We are led another route. Led in fact, straight into a free-fire zone. Told by the Free Syrian Army to follow a road that was blocked off in the middle of no-man’s-land.
At that point there was the crack of a bullet and one of the slower three-point turns I’ve experienced. We screamed off into the nearest side-street for cover.
Another dead-end.
There was no option but to drive back out onto the sniping ground and floor it back to the road we’d been led in on.
Predictably the black car was there which had led us to the trap. They roared off as soon as we re-appeared.
I’m quite clear the rebels deliberately set us up to be shot by the Syrian Army. Dead journos are bad for Damascus.
Please, do not for one me moment believe that my experience with the rebels in al Qusair was a one-off.
This morning I received the following tweet:
“@alextomo I read your piece “set up to be shot in no mans land”, I can relate as I had that same experience in Al Zabadani during our tour.”
That was from Nawaf al Thani, who is a human rights lawyer and a member of the Arab League Observer mission to Syria earlier this year.
It has to make you wonder who else has had this experience when attempting to find out what is going on in rebel-held Syria.