...According to Frank, Signature executives explored “all avenues” to shore up its situation, including finding more capital and gauging interest from potential acquirers.
The deposit exodus had slowed by Sunday, he said, and executives believed they had stabilized the situation.
Instead, Signature’s top managers have been summarily removed and the bank was shuttered Sunday.
Regulators are now conducting a sales process for the bank, while guaranteeing that customers will have access to deposits and service will continue uninterrupted...
...For his part, Frank, who helped draft the landmark Dodd-Frank Act after the 2008 financial crisis, said there was “no real objective reason” that Signature had to be seized.
“I think part of what happened was that regulators wanted to send a very strong anti-crypto message,” Frank said.
“We became the poster boy because there was no insolvency based on the fundamentals.”
At the time, many in the industry saw Signature as the last resort for crypto companies to be able to have ties to traditional financial institutions, and they believed the bank most likely would take over as the go-to bank for the digital asset industry.
As far as I can tell, SVB is the one bank that was doing everything "right". They were loaning to businesses creating value, and had big capital reserves that got f***d with some of the fastest changes in interest rates.Somebody better hang.
The closure of Signature Bank, the third-largest bank failure in U.S. history, might have been just because regulators wanted to send a message against crypto.
Why regulators seized Signature Bank in third-biggest bank failure in U.S. history
The swift move shocked executives of Signature Bank, said board member and former congressman Barney Frank.www.cnbc.com
No insolvency?
I hope former Representative Frank is mistaken.
What Signature Bank Failure Means for Crypto, According to Experts
The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and the subsequent measures regulators took to avoid more damage on March 12 due to fears of contagion prompted the FDIC and the Federal Reserve to close...finance.yahoo.com
I had breakfast this morning with a former Citi bank manager. His take is that SVB was run by a bunch of non bankers (VC folks) who poorly managed their assets by focusing on near zero rate treasuries (no diversity) and when the interest rates rose and there was a run, they got caught in the cash crunch they could not get out of.As far as I can tell, SVB is the one bank that was doing everything "right". They were loaning to businesses creating value, and had big capital reserves that got f***d with some of the fastest changes in interest rates.
That is not what this guy says on youtube. His points:As far as I can tell, SVB is the one bank that was doing everything "right". They were loaning to businesses creating value, and had big capital reserves that got f***d with some of the fastest changes in interest rates.
That sounds like he thought risk management started and stopped with the feds regulations. And he wrote the software that was supposed to do the calculation that guy I quoted above above has just done? I may be seeing a problem.So SVB (using my software) were perfectly capitalized against credit risk. They faithfully followed government regulations and Federal Reserve guidance on future interest rates. Now SVB is no more. And that's how regulating the last crisis always sows the seeds for the next one..
Couple more points from the video above:If SVB didn't do that; they were incompetent or gambling.
The closure of Signature Bank, the third-largest bank failure in U.S. history, might have been just because regulators wanted to send a message against crypto.
In the kindest possible terms that is total bull****. Banks getting combined with investment and speculatory functions continues to play screwjob on everyone.As far as I can tell, SVB is the one bank that was doing everything "right". They were loaning to businesses creating value, and had big capital reserves that got f***d with some of the fastest changes in interest rates.
Banks worried about liquidity in the wake of Silicon Valley Bank’s collapse took out a combined $164.8 billion in loans from the Federal Reserve over the past week, according to Fed statistics released Thursday, topping a record set during the 2008 financial crisis.
Will the deposits in every community bank in Oklahoma, regardless of their size, be fully insured now?” asked Lankford. “Will they get the same treatment that SVB just got, or Signature Bank just got?”
Yellen acknowledged they would not.
Uninsured deposits, she said, would only be covered in the event that a “failure to protect uninsured depositors would create systemic risk and significant economic and financial consequences.”
Lankford said the impact of this standard would be that small banks would be less appealing to depositors with more than $250,000, the current FDIC insurance threshold
Yet if we nationalized the banks how many of those folks would be screaming about communism? Conversely, if the Biden administration did nothing and let the banks fail and there was a financial crisis as a result, do you think those folks would blame Biden for that?Treasury Secretary Yellen says not all uninsured deposits will be protected in future bank failures
Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen sought to reassure markets and lawmakers that the government will protect U.S. bank deposits amid a rash of bank failures.www.cnbc.com
Goodbye small banks!
I am shocked, shocked that big money depositors in California and New York get all their money instantly.
But if the same happened in the Midwest at a smaller bank, those noobs can get what they get after a year in bankruptcy court.
No government bailout of non-insured desposits for them.
They are not systemically important.
The Treasury Secretary said so.
The big banks win again.
In fact, they are winning so much...
Wall Street rides to the rescue as 11 banks pledge First Republic $30 billion in deposits
The news comes after First Republic's stock has been pummeled in recent days, sparked by the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank.www.cnbc.com
They are depositing billions into a smaller bank to help stabilize the system until the low interest government bonds mature another year or two and being forced to sell them won't have such a big loss.
Or interest rates drop again doing the same thing.
From the good of their hearts of course.
Hopefully they don't just withdraw it all at once some day when their small business rival has a misstep.
Yet if we nationalized the banks how many of those folks would be screaming about communism? Conversely, if the Biden administration did nothing and let the banks fail and there was a financial crisis as a result, do you think those folks would blame Biden for that?
Every week, the Federal Reserve, the US’s central bank, provides details of the emergency help it has provided to American banks over the past seven days.
In the last week, this rose from $15bn to $318bn – well in excess of the $130bn at the start of the Covid-19 pandemic and not far short of the $437bn at the height of the banking crisis after the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers in 2008.
The next brick falls
Shares of Credit Suisse lose more than a quarter of their value in one day, dragging down European and US markets.
Shares in Credit Suisse have plunged and dragged down other major European lenders as fears about deeper problems in the world banking system have spread in the wake of bank failures in the United States.
Credit Suisse shares lost more than a quarter of their value on Wednesday, hitting a record low after the Swiss bank’s biggest shareholder, the Saudi National Bank, told news outlets that it would not inject more money into the bank, which was beset by problems long before the US banks collapsed.
The turmoil caused an automatic suspension in trading of Credit Suisse shares on the Swiss market and sent stock in other European banks tumbling, some by double digits.
That fanned new fears about the health of financial institutions following the recent collapse of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank in the US.