The Epstein Files

Trump administration debating releasing transcript of Ghislaine Maxwell interview with DOJ, sources say​

By
Alayna Treene
Paula Reid
Kristen Holmes
Updated 1 hr 24 min ago



This undated trial evidence image obtained December 8, 2021, from the US District Court for the Southern District of New York shows British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell and US financier Jeffrey Epstein in Queen's log cabin at Balmoral.

This undated trial evidence image obtained December 8, 2021, from the US District Court for the Southern District of New York shows British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell and US financier Jeffrey Epstein in Queen's log cabin at Balmoral.
US District Court for the Southern District of New York

The Justice Department has an audio recording of the interview it conducted with Jeffrey Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell last month, and the administration is considering releasing a transcript of the interview publicly, three senior administration officials told CNN.

The existence of the recording has not been previously reported and comes at a time when the Trump administration is facing pressure to be more transparent with the information it has related to Epstein. Administration officials are currently discussing whether to release the transcript of Maxwell’s interview with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, the three senior administration officials told CNN.The administration has been transcribing and digitizing the recording. Portions of the transcript that could reveal sensitive details like victim names would also have to be redacted, one of the officials said.

As of Tuesday morning, the discussions over potential publication of the transcripts and the audio were ongoing. “A final decision has not been made,” one of the officials said. Another official told CNN that, within the White House, some of the conversation has focused on whether making the details from the interview public would bring the Epstein controversy back to the surface at a time when many officials close to President Donald Trump believe the story has largely died down.

However, the officials, many of whom have been frustrated with the rollout of the information regarding the Epstein case, have been eager to take control of the narrative and optics around the issue.

Two of the administration officials said if they were to release the audio and transcript, it would likely be done sooner rather than later. One said the release could be several weeks from now, depending on what the most senior-level officials within the West Wing and Justice Department decide. It was not immediately clear whether the White House and DOJ were aligned on the issue.

“This is nothing more than CNN trying desperately to create news out of old news. [Trump] already addressed this issue in an interview with Newsmax, a real news outlet that routinely gets better ratings than CNN,” White House Communications Director Steven Cheung told CNN.

CNN has reached out to the Justice Department. A lawyer for Maxwell declined to comment.

Blanche interviewed Maxwell at the US attorney’s office in Tallahassee last month over a period of two days. Maxwell was sentenced in 2022 to 20 years in federal prison for carrying out a years-long scheme with Epstein to groom and sexually abuse underage girls. She has continued to appeal her conviction, including with the Supreme Court.

Last week, Maxwell was moved from a Florida federal prison to a lower-security federal prison camp in Texas, a relatively uncommon move as those convicted of sex offenses are almost always deemed too high of a risk to public safety.
As Trump has faced mounting pressure from his base for transparency, the White House has repeatedly said the DOJ should release all “credible evidence” in the Epstein files.

Asked about Blanche’s meeting with Maxwell last week, Trump again said he’d like to see everything in the files released. “We’d like to release everything, but we don’t want people to get hurt that shouldn’t be hurt, and I would assume that was why he was there,” Trump told Newsmax on Friday.

The president said he hadn’t spoken to Blanche about his meetings with Maxwell and didn’t know when that information would be made public. “I haven’t spoken about it, but he’s a very talented guy, Todd Blanche, and a very straight shooter, and I think he probably wanted to know, you know, just to get a feeling of it,” Trump said.

CNN previously reported that a senior Trump administration official stated that the president is not currently considering clemency for Maxwell, though he has repeatedly left the door open on the matter in recent weeks, saying he’s “allowed to do it.”

This is a developing story and will be updated.

 
Maxwell gets easy prison for the next three and a half years then a pardon on Trump's last day in office and she doesn't need to say a word.

"last day in office"... how wonderfully optimistic. :undecide:

What US state is she being moved from?
 
"last day in office"... how wonderfully optimistic. :undecide:

What US state is she being moved from?
Florida to Texas

Speaker of the house thinks it is perfectly fine to shut down the US House to avoid voting to release the Epstein files.
Greg Abbott Governor of TX thinks it is criminal for TX elected Democrat reps to leave the state to shut down the TX government to avoid voting on redistricting.
 
The NYT has some more details, but not particularly juicy. I think he has slightly better taste than Trump, but not by much and not if you like tigers I guess.

1754493839411.png

Spoiler Pictures :
Letter from Woody Allen
1754493797779.png


There was Mr. Epstein smiling alongside Pope John Paul II, Mick Jagger, Elon Musk and Fidel Castro.
1754493753992.png


Also pictured were Larry Summers, former President Bill Clinton and Richard Branson.
1754493773664.png

 
Last edited:
I think this is suitable here. The point was made elsewhere:

Everyone knew about Jeffrey Epstein. Everyone knew about Diddy, R. Kelly, Bill Cosby, Harvey Weinstein, and the Catholic priests. Everyone knew about Donald Trump. I’m so tired of people protecting rich perverts, keeping their dark secrets for decades. So damn tired.

I kind of knew this, but Today I Learned about another quite separate example of the establishment joining ranks to protect the powerful:

How John Lydon’s comments about Jimmy Savile got him banned from the BBC

In 2015, while the Operation Yewtree investigation into abuse allegations from within the British media was in full swing, John Lydon of The Sex Pistols announced something quite startling. After participating in an interview [in 1978] in which he made comments about the rumours surrounding the BBC TV and Radio presenter Jimmy Savile, Lydon was banned from the BBC. Decades later, he announced that he believed his exclusion from the broadcasting service was the result of someone from high up in the BBC wanting to silence the allegations against Savile. Allegations which, unfortunately, proved to be true.
 
Last edited:
I think at some point we have to admit that the upper echelons of modern human civilization are operated by a class of thieves, crooks, and pedophiles.

The sort of values we live by as a civilization express themselves in the sort of leadership we get. By that I am including political, economic, business, and cultural leaders. Maybe this is just who we are as a species and civilization.

And yeah, sure, you can easily find leaders of all shapes and sizes who aren't any of that. But do many of them make it all the way to the top? Does some random non-pedophile prime minister of Estonia or Canada get invited to the underage sex parties that the elites attend on secret islands? Probably not, but the political leaders of these countries are hardly global movers. There are far more influential people on the planet, like well connected billionaires, American presidents, and the British monarchy, to name a few.

Only the truly demented make their way to the top in our species' civilization. Maybe that says more about us than we'd like to admit.
 
I think at some point we have to admit that the upper echelons of modern human civilization are operated by a class of thieves, crooks, and pedophiles.
Has it ever been different?
 
Has it ever been different?

Maybe back when we used to be snails or some sort of fish. There's bound to be an animal in our evolutionary history that didn't fancy younglings.
 
Back
Top Bottom