Gori the Grey
The Poster
- Joined
- Jan 5, 2009
- Messages
- 13,985
As mooted here first, mind you:Since Democrats are being investigated, those portions of the files should not be released. Since Republicans are not being investigated, those portions should be released.
I wonder if this can get any traction. It's a simple and straightforward enough principle, and to any reasonable person, it would subvert any grounds Bondi might offer for her chicanery. It's up against the willful irrationality of Trump and his supporters, though, and that's a heavy lift. There's none so blind as he who will not see. But sometimes a principle can be so self-evident as to disable such obfuscation.But I saw one treatment that gives the right angle of attack on this: "Well, Donald Trump's not under investigation, is he? You could release the documents that mention him." Then, having established that principle, "You haven't released the documents mentioning Donald Trump. Does that mean he too is under investigation?"
Probably not, even so. They'll just say, "There are lots of names of lots of people on every document, so we can't release even documents that show Republicans to be innocent because they also mention guilty Democrats."
Last edited: