The Impressions of NESing

Status
Not open for further replies.
In 1919 NES I had more espionage than pure intrigue; in that field, stalin006, Cleric and you are also quite good. Under intrigue I meant something like in LINES II. I am however losing my grasp on that sort of thing recently, mostly because of NES mortality. Nothing is as irritating as a perfect, long-honed cunning plan undone by a NES dying...
 
In 1919 NES I had more espionage than pure intrigue; in that field, stalin006, Cleric and you are also quite good. Under intrigue I meant something like in LINES II. I am however losing my grasp on that sort of thing recently, mostly because of NES mortality. Nothing is as irritating as a perfect, long-honed cunning plan undone by a NES dying...

Thank you, I think. Although that explains why the only nation I wasn't able to crack was Stalins *humph*. On that note I rather mishandeled Sweden in that NES, had about 4-5 turns no orders sent, And i had this very developed Spy network, Could have put it to use *mutter*.
 
I'm probably on tier two or one, my sheer incompetence and tendency to go on vacation, breaks, and etc when deciding wars are waged :(

And my even more incompetent attempts to try and become a warmonger...
 
I think I'm a tier three, due to general competence and skill but a lack of sheer military brilliance.
 
Should not be used for the sake of NESing!!!!!!
 
j_eps said:
Point System:

General Awards
Gold = 3
Silver = 2
Bronze = 1

Winner = 5

Best Player/anything like this
Gold = 7
Silver = 5
Bronze = 3

PAST AWARDS DO NOT COUNT! ALL NESers START WITH 0!

If you have suggestions, I am open to them. If wanted I could keep track, if not we can forget this for the rest of eternity.

I say we use the rankings we are now assigning to give everyone their starting points ;)

In which case, i vigorously campaign for Tier 4.
 
NESing is a game not a competition. Also, imagine the orders people would send "Lucky is 1 point ahead of me in the standings. Lets kill him so I can pass him"
 
j_eps said:
That system works for me. I am starting a thread for keeping track of points. NOTE: I will not include everyone. To be included, POST IN THE THREAD!

i get 3 points from the start due to handicap of skill.
 
That means that only the absolutely most powerful nations would get points. Also, some NESes (IE: Anything das does) have many more concentrations of competitive and skilled players. I don't think points would work accurately or particularly well.
 
EDIT: Anyway, personally I'd place myself on Tier Four; Tier Five is probably for Symphony D., and possibly Insane_Panda and North King. First place is overrated anyway - the Ottoman Empire was on the first place, and where it is now?

Yes, das, you are quite the little scheming byzantine! :p

I am of the opinion that Symphony D. is a robot. A rather amiable and funny robot, but a robot nonetheless.
 
I have now closed the thread and hopefully the idea of NES Standings. By closed I mean deleted all info and covered it all up, with the quoted things being the only remainder of the standings.

EDIT:POST # 300!
 
I'll be editing this over the next couple of days, so don't fret if you ain't up here yet. Basically I'm just rating players on a fier tier system, with five being the highest (bviosuly). I apologize for an offense beforehand.

He is doing a counting up system.
 
JosefStalinator said:
Wait... is Tier 1 lowest? That makes no sense...

You is correct, Tier one should be the highest tier, if Tier five is the supposed hall of greatness, what about six? and 7?
 
footbal is a game to, but its not competetive at all. why just the idea of a game being competetive is absurd!

-_-
 
Kentharu said:
footbal is a game to, but its not competetive at all. why just the idea of a game being competetive is absurd!

-_-

More of a story, Unless das is the mod.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom