kochman
Deity
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2009
- Messages
- 10,818
Yes, actually...Did you spend the Bush/Blair years under a rock ?
Oh, I thought you said, I-raq
Yes, actually...Did you spend the Bush/Blair years under a rock ?
So I assume 'Happy Endings' is set more in the affluent areas.
How has the police and local government been reacting to it, aside from sending in the National Guard.
Just when I think a post couldn't get anymore ridiculous and without substance, I am proven wrong...Conservatism is the ultimate cause of America's current and long run problems. Dialing that back is the most critical issue. Every other issue we are dealing with we are failing to resolve because we have become so conservative that we are unwilling to take the steps necessary to resolve them.
Allow them to fund campaigns is what makes them impossible to manage... the presidents are bought and sold for over $1B these days.I think the biggest problem is free market capitalism has created monsters too big for the government to manage. Look at the finance industry, the fossil fuel industry and a bunch of others. The government couldn't do jack about them if it wanted to unless there is a great public outcry for change.
Actually campaign finance is a good answer... that might be #1 on the list of non-cynical real answers for me.
Actually campaign finance is a good answer... that might be #1 on the list of non-cynical real answers for me.
Jeez dude... that's really the surface level of it.Does anything think that maybe, just maybe this campaign proved we don't need campaign finance reform? Look at the oodles of money flowing through the Republican SuperPACs that didn't change the outcome.
I'm not saying I'm right, just bringing it up for discussion.
Does anything think that maybe, just maybe this campaign proved we don't need campaign finance reform? Look at the oodles of money flowing through the Republican SuperPACs that didn't change the outcome.
I'm not saying I'm right, just bringing it up for discussion.
Hey I'm just raising the possibility.It would be dangerously naive to say that since Karl Rove looked like a fool on election night, we're totally fine going forward.
Do we know how many of those won? Also, even if we could get campaign finance reform through, would that lessen or stop lobbying? That's just as big of a problem as outside campaign financing though they are entertwined.There's two big reasons: 1) It's not just the national election that should be concerning. Lots and lots of local State elections saw money pour in from outside groups seeking to install their own personal candidates.
I'm not approaching this from a Rove lost = we win perspective. Rather I'm just looking at the fact that one side spent more money than other via SuperPACs and they lost and using that to suggest maybe SuperPACs themselves are overrated as a threat to democracy.2) Just because "the right side" for some of us won, that doesn't mean the system is good. It still is having a profound effect on the way both sides have to function, and who both sides have to listen to and chase after for money. Money and politics go hand in hand outside of election cycles too. Needing billions and billions of dollars to run a campaign is not a good thing.
Hey, how can you follow us into being a police state up north if you don't have enough prisons?So those are local issues. Country-wide, I think a big one is the idiotic plan by the conservative government to build more jails - and to privatize some of them. Crime rates have been falling over the last 2 decades - there is no need for jails.. and private jails are just the worst idea ever.
Doesn't matter... still makes BOTH sides beholden to corporations for massive contributions.I'm not approaching this from a Rove lost = we win perspective. Rather I'm just looking at the fact that one side spent more money than other via SuperPACs and they lost and using that to suggest maybe SuperPACs themselves are overrated as a threat to democracy.