The NRA Finally Responds With Its "Meaningful Contributions"

What right do you imagine I want to deny homosexuals?

Tread carefully here Forma...
You claim not to, yet you rationalize and defend those who do discriminate against homosexuals.
 
Okay. Do you also support the right of such groups to use weapons against the police in cases when the police appear as a hostile or malevolent force?

I don't understand what you mean here.

At that point it would seem to be a question more equivalent to "Should our government be overthrown."

To which, it doesn't matter at that point what I believe, it isn't going to be allowed.
 
You claim not to, yet you rationalize and defend those who do discriminate against homosexuals.

So despite what I say (as you just admitted yourself), you have invented a bizarro Patroklos to fantasize about instead. Awesome, and expected.

Please do quote these rationalizations and defense of somebody you haven't disclosed that apparently are at odds with what you just admitted my stated positions are.
 
So despite what I say (as you just admitted yourself), you have invented a bizarro Patroklos to fantasize about instead. Awesome, and expected.

Please do quote these rationalizations and defense of somebody you haven't disclosed that apparently are at odds with what you just admitted my stated positions are.
Let's see your criticism of Mobboss and his DADT views. The posts where you have advocated the abolishment of this policy, and the other still existing homophobic policies in the US military, such as those against sodomy. I seemed to have missed them all.

And while you are at it, you can provide examples of how you have criticized your own church for its views towards homosexuals in this forum. And all the times you have spoken out against homophobia and bigotry in the numerous threads on those topics.

Or the posts which show you are a staunch advocate of the ACLU in its similar fights against discrimination, persecution, and homophobia.

IIRC Patroklos is pro-gay marriage.
I'm sure that counts for a lot from your own perspective.
 
Wait, so you make an accusation against me, admit in the same sentence that you know my public positions are contrary to that accusation but you know better, provide no proof to bak any of this up when asked and then want me to prove your mind reading skills for you?

Let me translate for everyone here who doesn't speak Formaese: "I am Forma, I made a mistake but can't admit that to myself or anyone else, thus I am doing to spam this thread with random nonsense and hope people forget or are driven from the thread."

Let me do some prophesizing here. I see Forma making a post about a persecution complex, probably something about how military people are rascists/bigots/idiots/necropheliacs/whatever thrown in for good measure, with a good helping of inappropriate "" marks.
 
I'm sure that counts for a lot from your own perspective.

Maybe, maybe not. That's not really the point.

For the record, I'm opposed to DADT, I think people should be able to serve in the military while being openly gay, at least to whatever extent is acceptable for anyone else to serve in the military while being open about their sexuality (Disruptive behavior should be equally banned for both gay people and other people.)

I'll admit to not being completely comfortable with it personally, mainly because I'd be uncomfortable changing in front of someone who was gay or being in a foxhole with them (Although that's more my fault than theirs, overall) but the majority of the people in the Pentagon do not feel this way.

I care far more about other military issues though. Bombing Muslims is more evil than banning gay people from serving in the military.
 
Wait, so you make an accusation against me, admit in the same sentence that you know my public positions are contrary to that accusation but you know better, provide no proof to bak any of this up when asked and then want me to prove your mind reading skills for you?

Let me translate for everyone here who doesn't speak Formaese: "I am Forma, I made a mistake but can't admit that to myself or anyone else, thus I am doing to spam this thread with random nonsense and hope people forget or are driven from the thread."

Let me do some prophesizing here. I see Forma making a post about a persecution complex, probably something about how military people are rascists/bigots/idiots/necropheliacs/whatever thrown in for good measure, with a good helping of inappropriate "" marks.

It obviously wasn't specifically directed at you. It was actually in reference to Traitorfish' question to GW.

But are you saying you have no real proof that you ever criticized DADT, the homophobic policies of the US military, the Roman Catholic Chuch, or any other similar topic in this forum which appear quite regularly? I certainly can't remember any. But go ahead and show I'm wrong.

"Tread carefully here", Patroklos.
 
You made the accusation Forma, why are you so impotent in the face of providing proof for your slander?

Obviously you didn't tread carefully enough, as your little fantasy world is collapsing around you. I knew you were fragile which is why I warned you...
 
I think it is quite clear which of us is imagining that a post clearly not directed at them was.

And I'm still waiting for examples of how you are an outspoken advocate of homosexuals and their rights in this forum. There must be something other than you are apparently not opposed to gay marriage. After all, there have been so many topics, especially those dealing with the homophobia in the US military and the Roman Catholic Church, both of which you are a member.
 
I want to see where you denounced the Nazis. If you can't show us, there is only one conclusion we can draw.

After that, prove to us you are not into necrophilia. Have you ever stated emphatically you aren't attracted to dead bodies? A quick forum search yielded up nothing...
 
I think it is quite wise of you not to openly criticize the Republican Party, the US military, and the Roman Catholic Church, even though you supposedly think those views are quite reprehensible. It shows great loyalty by keeping quiet instead of speaking out against such grave injustice, blatant discrimination, and rampant homophobia.
 
That's exactly what a Nazi necrophiliac would say.

So can we get back to how Forma wants to fingerprint and photograph and database 100+ million Americans in the name of liberty?
 
Form hates gun owners, despite being a (Former?) gun owner. The cognitive dissonance is pretty incredible.

I used to think Formaldehyde was actually a left-wing libertarian, but he's looking more and more like a partisan democrat every post.
 
The simple fact is there is a group in the US whom honestly believes we are on the cusp of some right wing coup supported by a rascist Christian fundalemtalist military and 300 billion backwoods militia members. Gun Control is their way of striking first, so their enemies are denied access to the magic boom sticks of doom.
 
Back
Top Bottom