tomsnowman123
Simple Liver
I don't like any of the candidates in the OP much.
Errr... well I think the point was that they were unelectable, so it is not surprising that you don't like them.
Romney is a flip flopper who once tried to get to the left of Ted Kennedy on abortion, will swing right to get the nomination and will get trounced in the general. The evangelicals will sit at home instead of vote for someone they consider a member of a cult.
Regarding Romney, I have no issue whatsoever with his faith, and I think it's pretty stupid to not vote for him just because he's a Mormon. My concern is simply rooted in the fact that, Republican or not, he managed to get enough people to vote for him to win that also elected Ted Kennedy.
The evangelicals were motivated in 2000 and 2004 and got Bush one-state victories. They sat at home in 2006 and we saw what happened there. I guess it all depends on how much evangelical support he loses in places like Florida and Ohio. In Texas, the typical Southern Baptist would be very reluctant to vote for a Mormon, especialy one from the land of Dukakis, Kennedy, and Kerry. Many would just sit at home and not vote at all.the jury is still out as to how much evangelical support is necessary.
http://www.boston.com/news/local/articles/2005/07/03/clarity_sought_on_romneys_abortion_stance/When he ran for US Senate in liberal-leaning Massachusetts in 1994, Romney said abortion should be ''safe and legal." As a candidate for governor in 2002, he said he would keep the state's abortion rights laws intact and has since said that he kept that promise. But this year, as he began preparing a potential run for president, Romney said he is ''in a different place" than he was when he first ran for office in 1994 and has stressed that he is ''personally prolife."
Romney was asked repeatedly by the Globe last week to elaborate on his abortion stance, and he refused. ''I think I've said it a few hundred times through my campaign the same thing I'll say today, which is that I personally do not favor abortion. But as governor of Massachusetts, I will keep the laws as they exist," Romney said Wednesday.
Indeed, that why the usians need to have an elderly, black, handicapped female president sooner rather then later.
No, I'm not trying ot be funny, think about it.
- When you're in the supermarket and an old woman wants to cut in line in front of you, you curse her in your head but you will let her cut in line.
- Black because you can't criticize them, or you're racist.
- Handicapped, same reason as the old woman. You just can;t refuse them anything without feeling like a complete bastard.
(I thought about gay or lesbian, but since the prez will have to deal with all kinds of religious nutcases all over the world, I let that one slip.)
Just think of the diplomatic advantage you now have! Pax America around the corner.
The evangelicals were motivated in 2000 and 2004 and got Bush one-state victories. They sat at home in 2006 and we saw what happened there. I guess it all depends on how much evangelical support he loses in places like Florida and Ohio. In Texas, the typical Southern Baptist would be very reluctant to vote for a Mormon, especialy one from the land of Dukakis, Kennedy, and Kerry. Many would just sit at home and not vote at all.
I am willing to bet one of the people on PP list will win the whole thing.
As for the earlier question about Wesley Clarks baggage......his former campaign went into the toilet when he got endorsed by Michael Moore. Whacko endorsement = kiss of death.
I'd like to see some evidence via polling or something that indicates he would not be voted for due to being a Mormon. I personally think that is a crock.