@Slaakman: in music (and many other fields as well) perfection is very much subjective.
For instance, of your selection:
#1 - I could stand for only 6 seconds, then switched off;
#2 - I agree it is catchy though hardly gets into my top 11 (or top 50). I don't switch the channel when it sounds on radio though;
#3 - Nah, I don't like it. Sometimes I even do switch the channel when it's on radio;
#4 - Killed me in 46 seconds;
#5 - It was a joke, right?
#6 - 3 seconds, then skipped to about 11 minutes, and killed it. So, 5 seconds total. How anyone can endure 2 whole hours of that is beyond me.
#7 - Music starts at about 0:25 there, and it is not bad. Not good enough to keep me listening for more than another minute though. And I wouldn't search for it to, say, have a record to play in my car when driving. Neither would I switch from it if it was on radio (generally, I think this criterion is like the coarse filter - would I switch if it was on radio? So please forgive me for applying it to all samples, it's a knee jerk thing, there's nothing I can do about it

). The video was just a waste of money IMO.
#8 - "This video is unavailable" But did you mean Ozzy's? No... And Europe's is no better while different. It must have been something else.
#9 - Stopped at 1:16. I'm not saying it was bad, but what made you include it in this selection of 11? It sounds so... ordinary...

#10 - Really good choice. You get me on your side with this one.
#11 - And this one reminded me I've never been a fan of David's...
All the above is not to argue about anything, it's just that there's no such thing as
universally perfect music, apparently.