Insane_Panda
Deity
Saying that the Mongols fell apart is like saying that Charlemange's empire fell apart--it wasn't, it simply was divided up amongst the heirs. It was hardly falling apart, it wasn't being destroyed by rebellion, it wasn't imploding due to infighting--it simply continued in the form of smaller units. And that is not really silveresque. Silver's empires just tend to implode, period. The only time it split into definite successor states was during a BT--all the other times, it pretty much just fell apart, nothing like the divisions of empires that we see.
But do you consider the separate states which formed out of Charlemagne's death to be one unified Frankish Empire? These states can hardly be considered continuations of the Mongol Empire as a whole. Mongols were perhaps Contemptian in their skills in combat, but were hardly Contemptian in their consolidation of the lands they conquered. Thusly, it seems more fitting to equate Contempt with other nations/leaders.