Guess it's a good thing that he's going after the vote of Michigan auto workers instead of you.
Good thing for him, bad for the USA.
Guess it's a good thing that he's going after the vote of Michigan auto workers instead of you.
While it won't affect the price of oil, it does affect the physical supply. If say the SOH gets closed while the price of oil worldwide will increas, our physical supply is still available even if it is expensive. Expensive oil is bad enough, no supply period is worse.
I don't think this is true, either. To the extent one can talk about "the United States' physical supply of oil," the United States buys its oil from the market. Beyond the Strategic Reserve, the United States doesn't have a "physical supply" of oil. If the Straits of Hormuz are closed, everyone will pay more for oil. Oil companies are not going to give us a break because we've been buying from Canada.
I don't see how whether we deal with Middle Eastern countries now has any bearing on what will happen if the Straits are closed in the future.
Cleo
If the Unions were half reasonable they'd understand that keeping the excessive salaries and gigantic benefits that Michigan auto-workers have would mean the death of the US auto industry.
And yet they refused to negotiate, and the US auto industry is going down the drain, and so is Michigan to some degree.
To call the unions victims is just too much. As I said, they are overpaid whiners whose reluctance to accept that they are paid way more than they deserve caused the collapse of their industry.
It was not a lack of sales that destroyed the american car industry, it was the huge costs.
Compare the cost of an employee at a Toyota plant in Japan and one in any plant in Michigan. Of course, the companies are the ones ultimately to blame. They should have fired all those whiners and relocated to Mexico or elsewhere.
You've never once looked at the US auto industry, have you?
I can't even be bothered to explain where you are wrong![]()
You've never once looked at the US auto industry, have you?
I can't even be bothered to explain where you are wrong![]()
I guess upper management isn't to blame for failing to see the increase in oil prices coming or for not putting out a product mix that would be in better demand.It's just been impacted more lately due to the increased cost of oil and less demand for SUV's.
Yes, Obama cant make a good speech. When it's pre-arranged and he has a teleprompter he can speak well.
When it's just questions, he stumbles a lot.
As far as spending, neither McCain nor Obama are going to make a surplus. Both are putting bigger debts. As it stands now, McCain is more than Obama, but so far there hasnt (to my knowledge) been an actual release of what his healthcare is going to cost.
If you think we're going to be in a nice surplus under Obama, you're mistaken.
I guess upper management isn't to blame for failing to see the increase in oil prices coming or for not putting out a product mix that would be in better demand.
Well, shouldn't upper management be better at dealing with the MAJOR part of the problem? If they can't be, shouldn't the shareholders find somebody that is?Like I said, the UAW is a major part, not ALL of it.
Obama rarely uses a teleprompter. McCain always does, though. When it's just questions, McCain stumbles too. You haven't seen them much, have you???
Whether or not the government has a surplus isn't as big a problem as if the MIDDLE CLASS has a nice surplus.
Yes, I heard some of Obama at that saddle back.
1. Uhhhh, wellllll, uhhhhhh, if-if-if-if. I'm sure McCain stumbles too...just simply stating that when everything isnt pre-arranged Obama stumbles like crazy.
2. As far as the middle class goes....Obama has some crazy spending. Universal Healthcare...his global Poverty act....and yet he says he's going to cut taxes.
3. Sorry, but you can't increase spending and cut taxes.
2. Those are good projects.
Well, shouldn't upper management be better at dealing with the MAJOR part of the problem? If they can't be, shouldn't the shareholders find somebody that is?
That cost a ton.
Sorry, but if you think the middle class are going to get some giant tax break on top of all this spending, you're seriously mistaken.
The rich and corporations can only pay for so much.
Not to mention corporations will just pass the cost on to you.
The whole system has to go.
You've never once looked at the US auto industry, have you?
I can't even be bothered to explain where you are wrong![]()
Which corporations?
Yes, the middle class WILL get a tax break from George W. Bush. If George W. Bush can spend like mad and lower taxes on the rich, Obama can spend and cut a lot of other federal spending while lowering taxes on the middle class. The rich will get taxed higher. Prosperity doesn't just trickle down to the rest of us when The richest get lower taxes.
That's not a government system. It's a tried and tested economic system that has lasted for as long as the idea of stock has existed.