The very many questions-not-worth-their-own-thread question thread XXV

Status
Not open for further replies.
High school was fun. College not so much.

High school was hell for me. College sounds insanely different from what I've experienced. You have to read actual books and engage actual ideas? I've never had that happen except of my own accord.

I think anyone who seriously enjoys going to school must have something dead inside them.
 
High school was hell for me. College sounds insanely different from what I've experienced. You have to read actual books and engage actual ideas? I've never had that happen except of my own accord.

i get away with not reading the books. in my experience, you either go to class and take notes or read the books.
 
It makes you learn things, but that's basically useless, right?

Pretty much. I can't recall a single useful thing I've gotten out of that decade.
 
You don't spend a decade in high school. :confused: There's likely a lot of things you learnt from school that you never realized were from school.
 
What is the difference, on a technical level, between an opera and a musical? Is there really a clear divide?
Yes, as some have posted.

I can't say I'm very fond of either.
You might be surprised. My grandfather went to a production of Kiss Me, Kate and enjoyed it. Mind you, he went as my guest because I was part of the backstage crew.

This is true, but then I tried to work out the difference between The Pirates of Penzance and Jesus Christ Superstar, and I fell a bit flat.
The Pirates of Penzance is an operetta and Jesus Christ Superstar is a rock opera. They're not remotely the same thing.

By that definition, comic opera (specifically G&S) isn't opera?
Nope.


During my years in the theatre, I mostly worked on musicals. My first exposure to musical theatre was in my junior high music classes, when we learned a lot of songs from the Broadway musicals and some of the Disney movies. And then the teacher got over-ambitious and decided we were going to put on a production of Carmen for our families... :ack: My grandfather was less than impressed; his only comment was (imagine a gruff man in his mid-70s talking in a Swedish accent): "Dose boys need to learn how to march!" My grandmother was impressed with the boy who played Escamilio the Toreador, even though he had to stand on tiptoes to reach the highest notes.

Fast-forward to when I was in high school and got dragged to a production of Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat. My grandmother had previously gone to a few musicals and loved them. She tried to get me to come with her, but I told her, "I spent a lot of time learning those songs in school and I don't want to hear them anymore." I'd gone to a production of My Fair Lady (because my neighbor was in it). It was good, but not enough to make me into a die-hard musical fan. But with "Joseph" it was because the granddaughter of one of her friends was going to be in it that she wouldn't give up badgering me until I went (I was resisting because it was based on the Old Testament)...

And damn, I was hooked. Almost instantly. I saw that show a couple more times - once with my mother, who loved the Pharaoh-as-Elvis number, and the last time on closing night. After the main curtain call, the actor playing the Pharaoh announced that they were going to have the techhies come out and take a bow as well, because they worked hard and never got much recognition. I was flabbergasted to see that some of the backstage workers were no older than I was (high school age), and I thought, "You mean I could do this? It must be amazing!"

So the next time they put out a call for backstage workers (for the following year's spring musical), I applied. It was for Kiss Me, Kate (a musical about a group of actors putting on a production of Shakespeare's Taming of the Shrew). I do love music, and if I hear stuff I especially like and think I would enjoy playing, I make the effort to memorize it. So my grandmother was really happy when I learned "Wunderbar," since she loves waltzes. To this day I have fond memories of that show, and still remember the songs (and the actors' voices). Mind you, I had an almost-front row seat for most of it, considering that my part was to sit in a lighting booth above the stage and fly a fake bird that was supposed to swoop down at the end of the first act.

Thus began a 12+ years' involvement with musical theatre. I worked on Kiss Me, Kate, Guys and Dolls, Jesus Christ Superstar, The Sound of Music, The King and I, Gypsy, West Side Story, Grease, Camelot, Peter Pan, A Dish of Cream, The Music Man, The Boyfriend, Man of La Mancha, and the last one was a revival of Jesus Christ Superstar 20 years after the first time around (the first one was a thousand times better, in my opinion). I also worked on a dinner theatre or two, and several Shakespeare plays.


Both Jesus Christ Superstar and Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat are rock operas, and have no spoken words. Everything is sung.


Musicals are amazing to watch, and a fantastic backstage experience.




Did anyone else find school in its entirety traumatic and of zero use whatsoever? Or is it just me?
Did you become as literate as you are between the ages of 0-5, or did you wait until you were out of high school to learn to read, write, and do math? :confused:
 
High school was hell for me. College sounds insanely different from what I've experienced. You have to read actual books and engage actual ideas? I've never had that happen except of my own accord.

I think anyone who seriously enjoys going to school must have something dead inside them.

You may be right. I had issues and worked at my own pace for four years, trying my hardest in my own way to prove to every body that I could do something with my life.

When I got to college, I had to do what the professor wanted, and it went down hill from there.
 
Did you become as literate as you are between the ages of 0-5, or did you wait until you were out of high school to learn to read, write, and do math? :confused:

I became literate in first grade. My reading comprehension and speed soared after I could string together basic words because I read so much (Captain Underpants mainly- nothing the school made me read stuck). My essays were always horrible and dead sounding. I learned to really write after I discovered that chatting wasn't the horrific stalker bait I'd been brought up to believe, and joined a forum. And my math is limited to essentially arithmatic, with some basic pre-algebraic and algebraic concepts (although I've forgotten how to do long division properly). This is because I haven't found an outlet for learning it yet.
 
President Obama, the merciless?

(CNN) -- This month, one of the least merciful presidents in the history of the United States granted 13 pardons and eight commutations of sentence. The grants moved President Barack Obama's overall mark past the administrations of John Adams (who served only one term), William H. Harrison (who died of pneumonia after serving only 30 days), James Garfield (who was fatally wounded by an assassin after serving only four months) and George Washington.

The New York Times complained that, when it came to the pardon power, there was just "no excuse" for Obama's "lack of compassion" and encouraged him to "do much more." Meanwhile, the Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank, lamented the "drought" of pardons in the Obama administration and called the recent grants "mingy and belated." Conservative columnist Debra Saunders wrote that it was "about time" Obama acted, and even tossed out the possibility/hope that he might "do it again soon."

...the Founding Fathers considered the pardon power an integral part of our system of separation of powers and checks and balances. Its presence in the Constitution is premised on the notion that Congress and the Courts are not always perfect. Anyone care to disagree? It simply follows that, if the pardon power is being neglected or abused, then government is not doing what it was meant to do.

Obama has granted 52 pardons to date. There is a much better than average chance that readers cannot name a single recipient. George W. Bush granted almost 200.
 
I became literate in first grade. My reading comprehension and speed soared after I could string together basic words because I read so much (Captain Underpants mainly- nothing the school made me read stuck). My essays were always horrible and dead sounding. I learned to really write after I discovered that chatting wasn't the horrific stalker bait I'd been brought up to believe, and joined a forum. And my math is limited to essentially arithmatic, with some basic pre-algebraic and algebraic concepts (although I've forgotten how to do long division properly). This is because I haven't found an outlet for learning it yet.
Then you did learn something useful in school.

Forums weren't around when I was in school - not even during my college years. I wonder what kind of difference that might have made in how I did my assignments. :hmm:
 
How often do you guys suppose oral herpes is spread among Catholics due to the whole "kiss the priest's ring" thing?

I'd be more concerned about how Catholic communion shares the same cup of wine with the whole congregation(when they actually include the blood).
 
Seriously? They don't have a tray with a bunch of tiny little shot glasses ( they're not really shot glasses ) that ushers pass around?

rw508ab.jpg
 
Seriously? They don't have a tray with a bunch of tiny little shot glasses ( they're not really shot glasses ) that ushers pass around?

rw508ab.jpg

Newp. That and the grape juice is a protestant thing. They have a chalice they pour some actual wine in that you can sip from after the priest hands you the wafer. If you're old, prevat2, you won't take the wine, only the priest will(there are details here I'm not up on) and you'll have him put the wafer directly in your mouth so you don't handle it. Or, if you are a protestant at mass, you'll stay on the pew. Catholic communion is not universal, it's not offered to you.
 
In Dutch Catholic churches, most of the time only the priest and his 'staff' get the wine.
 
Back when I was Catholic I don't recall the wine ever being offered to the congregations.
 
I don't think it is always, but it is fairly frequently where my wife attends. She says it depends on the priest. Then she chastised me for referring to it as wine.
 
Moderator Action: Please don't use CFC to solicit advice on how to obtain pirated material, and please don't provide such advice should someone attempt to solicit it. Related posts deleted.
 
I'd be more concerned about how Catholic communion shares the same cup of wine with the whole congregation(when they actually include the blood).
An Anglican church I went to had a common cup and practiced open communion, and their bulletins had a bit explaining that the alcohol in the wine was an effective antiseptic. Not sure if that was true, but there you go. They used port, which is stronger than usual.

In Orthodox Churches, they place the bread/body (we're not entirely sure which it is at that point) directly in the chalice, and then the priest uses a spoon to serve both elements mixed together. And of course, we kiss everything we can get our lips on. It's a religion that definitely discourages germophobia.

Also, is this an appropriate place for me to complain about how much I hate those little shot glasses? They really take away the oomf of the whole thing.
I don't think it is always, but it is fairly frequently where my wife attends. She says it depends on the priest. Then she chastised me for referring to it as wine.

I believe it's one of those things that became more acceptable after Vatican II. A lot of traditionalists really don't like it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom