Judges are supposed to be neutral and impartial. A lawyer explicitely not. I think this makes a big difference.
The Very-Many-Questions-Not-Worth-Their-Own-Thread Thread XLII
- Thread starter GinandTonic
- Start date
- Status
It varies from country to country, though. Here, judges are appointed. In other places they run for election, which is just bizarre. And of course Supreme Court judges are often selected not for their ability to be impartial, but because of their political leanings on certain issues (namely abortion and same-sex marriage).
One judge here was flabbergasted to lose his job because he asked a rape victim why she didn't just keep her knees closed.
they are testing out getting Fox viewers. The interview was a total s*** show of poorly executed interviewing.
Did they get that O'Reilly bloke in now?
r16
not deity
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2008
- Messages
- 11,195
so , whose idea it was to make the Chief of Staff of the good side in the war upnorth disappear ? By gunshots and stuff ? Arguing for a timely retreat like 6 or 8 months back and so on ... To be the first premise of his political platform to run against Zelensky , too .
Not to interrupt this fascinating conversation, guys, but do you realize that you passed post #1000 awhile ago? This is a serial thread.
@Chukchi Husky, the honor of being the next OP is yours.
@Chukchi Husky, the honor of being the next OP is yours.
Yes. I will close this one and move the EV chat to a new thread.
- Status
Similar threads
