@Arakhor, @Plotinus, and anyone else based in the UK:
I have what will probably seem like a dumb question for you, but here it is: There is a vocal, very rude bunch of people on FB who insist that Harry and Meghan's children don't exist. They say that the kids in the Christmas cards are AI and the kids in the photos are rented (apparently you have businesses there that rent children out to people who pretend to be their parents).
Not that I believe this BS for a moment, but just to confirm: Did they or did they not have two children - a boy named Archie, and a girl named Lillibet?
Some of the complaints are that the kids' faces aren't clearly in view. My answer is that it's reasonable to not want their faces plastered all over the newspapers and social media, due to security concerns. Nobody owes the public photos of their children.
Is this an actual thing there - a segment of society who believes that these kids don't exist? Or are they just internet crackpots?
I have what will probably seem like a dumb question for you, but here it is: There is a vocal, very rude bunch of people on FB who insist that Harry and Meghan's children don't exist. They say that the kids in the Christmas cards are AI and the kids in the photos are rented (apparently you have businesses there that rent children out to people who pretend to be their parents).
Not that I believe this BS for a moment, but just to confirm: Did they or did they not have two children - a boy named Archie, and a girl named Lillibet?
Some of the complaints are that the kids' faces aren't clearly in view. My answer is that it's reasonable to not want their faces plastered all over the newspapers and social media, due to security concerns. Nobody owes the public photos of their children.
Is this an actual thing there - a segment of society who believes that these kids don't exist? Or are they just internet crackpots?