UN/Diplomacy Planning Thread

So is Whomp going to do that ArneHD going to do that?

That will have to be Whomps call. After all, he only said that he didn't have a problem with me being the Secretary General, but we need an election to confirm.

So, new topic: Elect Secretary General.
 
IS that a emergency topic?
 
Whle HMG wholehartedly supports the laudable aim of increasing liberary access it feels compeled to question the absence of provision for localised rural educational materials in those areas so remote as to be beyond consideration for such a scheme.

The greatest levels of illeteracy occur in isolated villages. To obtain the optimum return on funds resorces need to be moved to those who cannot move to such eduational facilities as are already in existance. We therefore favor a small scale localised approach. The mountain must move to Mohamed.

With particular regard to the larger scale and more centralised liberaries suggestion HMG has concerns about the placement of infrastructure. Given the fractured nature of many developing countries it would be undesirable if development grants were to be used to reward political/ ethnic/ tribal or religious loyalties. While it would be counter-productive to appear paternalistic or to infringe the soverignty of developing nations it would be deeply regretable if this vital project were to become, what the Americans refer to so colourfully to, as pork contracts.

HMG therefore requires systems in place to insure these funds go to those who most require it, especially those least geographically and politically favored under the status quo.

Gin and Tonic, UK

Dear Representative of HMG.

Your point is very improtant, how to educate decentralised populations? The Norwegian suggestion is to distribute radios to small decentralised villages so that a system of remote education, where educational programs can be broad cast, or a more comprehensive system where teachers can educate over the radio.

Signed: Arne H D, Norwegian representative to the UN.
 
The sovereign nation of Russia wholeheartedly supports the fight for literacy and will contribute as far as is feasible to this effort. It must be stressed however that we allow the countries being helped the security of not being bullied into accepting our aid. Russia has as good a literacy rate as any country, but we also understand the large effort that such a move would take. We must not force those nations receiving aid to advance further or faster than is achievable. We will further investigate the matter as we have very little current knowledge of it.

Ethiopian Ambassador Redy- Your proposal to give aid to well-respected aid organizations instead of corrupt local leaders is quite reasonable and should be a major part of any planned UN declaration.

We also tentatively support your plan to erase many protective tariffs. First though, before we put our economies at stake, we must ensure that such states as China agree to comply.

Concerning your reparations plan, I am not entirely sure. My nation need not pay any reparations since we have committed no crimes against the Africans. I do support a plan to make nations which engaged in imperialism to give aid to the same peoples they aggrieved.

And, I've got to go now. But I'll try to get back as soon as possible. Sorry :(

We also agree with the proposal to require each representative to state their represented nation.

-RUSSIA
 
OK let's put a vote on SG and then we can move the thread and the proposals set forth.

As ambassador of the United States I will further comment on the literacy issues in the new thread.

My vote goes the the honorable man from Norway ArneHD.
 
My vote goes to the generous Whomp, of the USA .

Seeing that the topic of illiteracy belongs to him.
 
My vote goes to the United States ambassador Whomp, in recognition of his crucial role in starting these United Posters of Civfanatics.

It's probably the last time France will also support anything coming from the United States - for roleplay's sake :)
 
Whomp, UN representative from the USA does my vote go to.
 
It's probably the last time France will also support anything coming from the United States - for roleplay's sake :)
Hah! Howa about I send you a nice Cakebread Cabernet to change your mind. :p
 
The Nation of Italy vote goes to the honorable ambassador from the United States, Whomp.
 
Brazil will support WHOMP for secgen, if he publically states that the Cleveland Indians are an awesome baseball team.
 
Such a statement from the USA would cost them the vote of North Korea.
 
The Ambassador from the US shuts down the ambassador from Brazil with such odd talk and thanks the ambassdor from N. Korea for his vote of confidence. :crazyeye:
 
The Nation of Somaliland is tentatively considering Whomp as their vote, however we will finalize it if we are officially given full recognition.
 
The Ambassador from the US shuts down the ambassador from Brazil with such odd talk and thanks the ambassdor from N. Korea for his vote of confidence. :crazyeye:

Your failure to anwser the question at hand is cause many in North Korea to feel that the USA might become a arbiter of power over the UN taking away the diplomacy that North Korea is striving for.
 
The Ambassador from the US shuts down the ambassador from Brazil with such odd talk and thanks the ambassdor from N. Korea for his vote of confidence. :crazyeye:

Bah! The US is clearly more willing to work with terrorist rouge nations than with developing countries. Other delegates, take note!!!
 
Although this ambassador does not know the persons up for election, he'll stand with his allies, stand with the majority, and stand with the clear leader of the new proposed legislation topic. Russia votes for the American Ambassador, Whomp.

-RUSSIA
 
Bah! The US is clearly more willing to work with terrorist rouge nations than with developing countries. Other delegates, take note!!!

North Korea is not a terrorist or rouge nation, your country supports terrorist far more with it illegal drug traffic, which your country has failed to curtail.
 
Back
Top Bottom