I am a left leaning libertarian of the Georgist School.
That means I support Classical Liberalism in its purest, most radical form, which is quite different from what most people today consider either Liberalism or Classical Liberalism. I recognize a right to property in the fruit of one's own labor but also a common right to the gifts of nature, such that those who deprive others of equal access to nature by polluting or enclosing the commons must be made to compensate the dispossessed though some mix of direct payments (citizens'/residents' dividend/UBI) and public goods. Generally I err more on the side of providing a higher basic income rather than public goods, as no goods are equally valued by all members of society, but economies of scale may make the provision of some goods more justified. (I hate rhetoric calling for universal healthcare, or anything else that requires the labor of other humans, to be considered a basic human right; I am however quite willing to admit that public provision may be justifiable and far superior to the status quo system run by rent seeking corporations.)
I suppose Pigouvian taxes on negative externalities like pollution as well as land value taxes.
I suppose you could say I am also a Philosophical Anarchist. I'd prefer an anarchist form of Georgism but think a minarchist form is probably more feasible and still far superior to non-Geoist conceptions of Anarchism. Landlords in a Rothbardian Anarcho-Capitalist system and unions in Anarcho-Syndicalism are more State-like than a democratic state bound by a Georgist constitution.
I like the idea of arbitrarily small units being allowed to secede, but tend to dislike the motives of most secessionist movements.
I hate Nationalism in all its forms.
I'd prefer there be no sort of birthright citizenship, only contracts entered into with informed consent, but dislike jus sanquinis more than jus solis.
I strongly support Open Borders. If any state wants to keep people out, it needs to compensate all those who would otherwise immigrate. A state restricting migration is acting as a landlord on a grand scale.
I like free trade but hate so-called free trade agreements. I have no respect for those who claim to support free trade but do not want laborers to move as freely as capital.
I oppose the de jure monopolies commonly called Intellectual Property. It is better for the State to fund research directly than to incentivize private businesses by allowing them to prevent competition.
I'd prefer to live in a society with no alcohol or other recreational drugs, but recognize that enforcing laws against the use or trade in such substances has even worse effects.
I prefer unions act as mutual aid societies more than engaging in collective bargaining in which they may act to restrict employment opportunities of non-members.
