He's Scottish, Cardgame. They're all miserable, drunken sociopaths who'll stab you for the change for a deep-fried Curly-wurlyI read it when I was 12 or 13. Great reading for a kid. Gives you an optimistic outlook on life.

He's Scottish, Cardgame. They're all miserable, drunken sociopaths who'll stab you for the change for a deep-fried Curly-wurlyI read it when I was 12 or 13. Great reading for a kid. Gives you an optimistic outlook on life.
He was probably joking. In the bookwait, what?
wait, what?
Or, as Elrohir was saying, I could have been joking never mind that my father is, according to all clichés, thinking of going to a sheep expoHe's Scottish, Cardgame. They're all miserable, drunken sociopaths who'll stab you for the change for a deep-fried Curly-wurly![]()
I warn you: the ending is rather horrible.Reading Brave New World for English 120...very....very...very interesting book, its just getting good with the plot!
I warn you: the ending is rather horrible.
Spoiler :Especially as the humans in that dystopian future don't even understand the meaning of death or suicide.
I'm still working through Basic Writings of Existentialism. I just got through Kierkegaard's Fear and Trembling, Sickness unto Death, Dostoevsky's Notes from Underground and Sartre's Existentialism is a Humanism. All of those save Sickness unto Death were re-reads, but I hadn't read them in a few years.
Next up are The Genealogy of Morals by Nietzsche and Being and Nothingness by Sartre.
Just finished On the Beach by Nevil Shute. Not bad, but one of the most depressing books I've ever read.
He was probably joking. In the book
Spoiler :There's a nuclear war, and the radioactivity slowly spreads to the Southern hemisphere, which didn't really take part. So the last remaining people in Australia have to deal with their impending and inevitable doom. And most of them commit suicide in some fashion. And in the end, everyone everywhere dies.
My opinion of you and your intelligence, which already was pretty high, just went up several notches.I only got up to the beginning of Part One in Diamond's oft-mentioned work. But despite its reputation, it's not looking promising so far. I find the accusation of racism in a historical argument, followed by the establishment of what essentially amounts to the exact same argument with a few words switched around, to be exceedingly puzzling.