MobBoss
Off-Topic Overlord
Co-Chief Justices Clintons would have taken the Supreme Court in a different direction.
Hmm. Would Gore have been able to get a disbarred Bill Clinton approved by Congress? Somehow I dont think so.
Co-Chief Justices Clintons would have taken the Supreme Court in a different direction.
Shirley, you didn't take the Clinton detail cereally.Hmm. Would Gore have been able to get a disbarred Bill Clinton approved by Congress? Somehow I dont think so.
Shirley, you didn't take the Clinton detail cereally.
But, assuming consistency:
Up or down vote
Plus, the Senate already had found no there there to the Clinton thing by refusing to convict him.
Nevertheless, the Clinton detail was not really my point, so much as we would have something much different than Roberts & Alito on the Court today.
Being a lawyer isn't a requirement, but Clinton would never have been nominated, disbarred or not.He was disbarred by the Arkansas State Bar. The senate had nothing to do with that, and I dont think even democrats would be willing to put a disbarred attorney on the Supreme Court.
You are free to gibber about it how you will....
Being a lawyer isn't a requirement
Come on, USA is oligarchy. Nothing would changed. President only accepts trends which are already there in the elite.
Visa versa.
Not really.
It's relative to person who states and who reacts.
Give me a few minutes to type up a response, I need to wipe the vomit off from my screen.
The OP contains far too many specifics that simply cannot be predicted reliably. But here's a general one: if Gore had won in 2000, McCain would now be the President, Sarah Palin would be (the nation's first female) Vice President, and Obama would be just another guy in Congress.Back in October of 2001, you would have been hard-pressed to find a conservative who wasn't proclaiming "Thank God Bush won! Can you imagine if Gore were the president instead?"
Newsweek is trying to troll me?Looks like it's a direct hit.