inthesomeday
Immortan
- Joined
- Dec 12, 2015
- Messages
- 2,798
How high priority is some Filipino civilization?
How high priority is some Filipino civilization?
I can list countless events for every country that had a big and lasting impact, though.Perhaps its not worth the effort, but I would say the civil war had a big and lasting impact on the US historically.
As much as I'd like to see the Confederacy finally get its day in an RFC mod, I think that it, as well as Israel or the Papal States, just don't fit with the scope of the mod.
Israel and the Papal States would have 1 city cores, and unlike the Dutch, wouldn't have large historical areas to colonize.
The Confederacy would last less than a dozen turns regardless of speed, which makes crafting good historical victory goals nearly impossible.
I like the idea of adding the Swahili, Swedes, and Tamerlane/Turkic Central Asian civ. A Nubian civ (like Makuria in SoI) could be interesting, as could more Amerindian or African civs. (Zulus? - with the bigger map it might actually work)
Jerusalem did not exist in 3000 BC. In fact the Hollywood narrative of the Exodus is pretty much impossible. If there was an exodus of Semitic peoples from Egypt it would have almost certainly happened after the life of Ramesses. I think if there is any truth to teh Biblical narrative it's more likely that Ramesses was the pharaoh that took Joseph as a vizier.For Jerusalem and the Papal State, I would argue that 1 city civs should be allowed if they are sufficiently important in world history, such as Jerusalem and the Papal States.
Jerusalem especially is a civ I want as our current number of 3000 bc civs is quite low. It's also why I'm highly receptive to 3000 BC civ suggestions in general. Papal States is born more from a hatred of important cities being represented by independent cities. Whenever I find that something like Jerusalem, Rome, etc is supposed to be independant and not part of a major civ, a bit of myself dies inside. If I knew more about Native American/Asian cultures I'd probably be hurting even more tbh.
Really? Jerusalem is around at 3000 BC in DOC, so I just assumed a Jerusalem civ would start at the same time.Jerusalem did not exist in 3000 BC. In fact the Hollywood narrative of the Exodus is pretty much impossible. If there was an exodus of Semitic peoples from Egypt it would have almost certainly happened after the life of Ramesses. I think if there is any truth to teh Biblical narrative it's more likely that Ramesses was the pharaoh that took Joseph as a vizier.
Jerusalem did not exist in 3000 BC. In fact the Hollywood narrative of the Exodus is pretty much impossible. If there was an exodus of Semitic peoples from Egypt it would have almost certainly happened after the life of Ramesses. I think if there is any truth to teh Biblical narrative it's more likely that Ramesses was the pharaoh that took Joseph as a vizier.
This whole talk about including the CSA, and especially this part I have quoted - because no, it isn't uniquely 'vile' compared to other things you can do, such as engaging into the triangular slave trade, or something as simply as letting your cities starve, brutally crush rebellions, seize independent countries, annex entire continents, and ever so on - is extremely Americacentric.though it seems like a pretty vile choice for the player.
Not high, there are a few big name civs that definitely come first.
I don't want to be too specific here.