The penetration attack could use some adjustment. Tactically, it's best to lead with your armor, not your motorized infantry, because of its hardness and breakthrough. MOTs should be used for exploiting breakthroughs (with no enemy reserves) or walling off the flanks behind the advancing armor (with enemy reserves counterattacking). I also recommend having your armor attack from more than one province if at all possible to get flanking bonuses and rapidly increase combat width at the beginning of the battle. This particular axis of attack doesn't do you many favors, and it's a little hard to tell where the province boundaries lie, but something like this might be better for you:
edit: gah, those frontlines need cleaning up but I have to go to bed
1 German division holding like 120 Km front against 8 Russian Divisions
Someone WAKE Lexicus up and tell him to fix it up before the German 3rd Army is encircled !!!!! Take some Meth to stay awake if you have too.
The AI is stupid
Heh, you should have seen what it took to make the Soviets capitulate in Strategic Command. They kept moving their capital and i ended up having to take nearly every last soviet city before they finally gave up.The AI is stupid
The Moscow operation turned out successful natch but the Soviets are still only like 88% of the way to capitulation
Civilization is a fantastic multiplayer game.Civilization is crap co-op game. Make it dota autochess and I'm in!
Civilization is a fantastic multiplayer game.
How could you prefer playing against an AI than another person?
Is it boring or is it difficult?Competitiveness is boring, tbh. I'd rather collaborate with someone than work against them.
And you're competing either way, to win against the computer or a person. How is it better that your opponent is effectively scripted and can't think? How is that less boring?Competitiveness is boring, tbh. I'd rather collaborate with someone than work against them.
I find competing with a person a little more stressful, and when I play games I generally just want to relax. At the same time, it would be nice if "AI" didn't stand for "Artificial Idiocy."And you're competing either way, to win against the computer or a person. How is it better that your opponent is effectively scripted and can't think? How is that less boring?
And you're competing either way, to win against the computer or a person. How is it better that your opponent is effectively scripted and can't think? How is that less boring?