Doesn't the presence of a king suggest a Maori state?
A state that is Maori, for sure, but not a 'Maori state' in the sense that the Maori collectively had a state.
Doesn't the presence of a king suggest a Maori state?
Flying Pig said:A state that is Maori, for sure, but not a 'Maori state' in the sense that the Maori collectively had a state.
I've found that Africa (outside of say Kenya and South Africa) is poorly serviced by general histories.
So was the Greek state, not a Greek state until the population transfers of the 1920s because a lot of Greeks still lived in the Ottoman Empire?
I've found that Africa (outside of say Kenya and South Africa) is poorly serviced by general histories.![]()
Persian Fire: The First World Empire and the Battle for the West - Tom Holland
The best work of history I've ever come across; far better than Peter Green. I judge it less on scholarship than narrative, and I have to say no other history book has even tried to give me a picture of the world it takes place in.
Persian Fire: The First World Empire and the Battle for the West - Tom Holland
The best work of history I've ever come across; far better than Peter Green. I judge it less on scholarship than narrative, and I have to say no other history book has even tried to give me a picture of the world it takes place in.
Wise decision. He's translated Herodotus very well - I remember reading one review which complained that on one instance he'd confused an aorist (the noose tightened) with an imperfect (the noose began to tighten), and thinking that if that's the only mistake that they could find then he must have done a good job.