Eh not quite in my opinion. He didn't give it a glowing, uncritical view but the central thesis was that only lolbertarianism can get people living on the moon. It was as much a political thesis on how human space colonies should (and will) work as it was a technically-oriented thriller. That's how I read it anyways.
There is a bit right at the end I want to talk about. Let me know when you finish.
One other thing - it was almost impeccably good 'hard' science fiction. He didn't resort to any handwaiving of physics. The one thing he missed was how badly the moon would be polluted. At the rate they launched satellites to and from it, the moon would have a thin, highly toxic atmosphere - enough of one to cause serious problems. I have a book from NASA that breaks down how it happens that I could recommend if anyone's interested. They did a study on major moon bases to support giant space stations in the 70s and analyzed this problem.
Since no one is breathing that atmosphere, what's the problem? Corrosive to surface equipment?