tjs282
Stone \ Cold / Fish
According to my badly handwritten attempt in GoogleTranslate, that's "задача трех тел"What am I reading?![]()
... which is ...
(The) Three Body Problem
According to my badly handwritten attempt in GoogleTranslate, that's "задача трех тел"What am I reading?![]()
It's science fiction, famous enough to be identified just by looking at the picture.
According to my badly handwritten attempt in GoogleTranslate, that's "задача трех тел"
... which is ...
(The) Three Body Problem
*nods*According to my badly handwritten attempt in GoogleTranslate, that's "задача трех тел"
... which is ...
(The) Three Body Problem
That's cheating!According to my badly handwritten attempt in GoogleTranslate, that's "задача трех тел"
... which is ...
(The) Three Body Problem
Well, judging by Hugo and Nebula awards, I assumed it's known in Anglosphere at least as well as in Russia.A bunch of stars? All I can think of is Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy.
That is indeed a sci-fi novel, but I hardly think it's super-famous.
Yep, dots are often omitted, unfortunately.There should be two little dots over the Е in Трёх, but, yes, that's the title in Russian.
No, just started.@red_elk Are you near the end of book1?
Interesting, a number of people have recommended it to me. What didn't you like about it?Hyperion by Dan Simmons (1/5)
For someone who likes older/classic sci-fi, it's probably fine. In my opinion, it tries too hard to be verbose and seems to revel in being unapproachable. The language, while not necessarily complex, is just structured in a way where it's a pain to slog through the exposition. The interactions between characters leave a lot to be desired too.Interesting, a number of people have recommended it to me. What didn't you like about it?
I'll give it a pass then. Big believer in these two of "Niven's Laws".For someone who likes older/classic sci-fi, it's probably fine. In my opinion, it tries too hard to be verbose and seems to revel in being unapproachable. The language, while not necessarily complex, is just structured in a way where it's a pain to slog through the exposition. The interactions between characters leave a lot to be desired too.
- It is a sin to waste the reader's time.
- If you've nothing to say, say it any way you like. Stylistic innovations, contorted story lines or none, exotic or genderless pronouns, internal inconsistencies, the recipe for preparing your lover as a cannibal banquet: feel free. If what you have to say is important and/or difficult to follow, use the simplest language possible. If the reader doesn't get it, then let it not be your fault.