If you agree with me that each person deserves a certain amount of "respect" or "attention", then you should agree that also nations - which are simply communities of people, of real persons (usually people who share some common identity) - not some "abstract formations" - also deserve them, as such.
I don't know if you've genuinely misunderstood me or try to twist my words, anyway:
1) Persons deserve respect on a basic level, as in that I recognize that they are fellow human beings that are not different from me. It's not that kind of respect I was referring to, and it's not that kind of respect nationalists demand. They want applause for their achievements or greatness, and want people to respect that it's there.
2) And more importantly, yes I do reject your notion of "nation = collection of people". People are individuals and should be judged as such, by their own merit. If someone achieves something great, then
he or she deserves the credit, not the nation the person's part of. Randomly being part of the same nation as that person doesn't entitle anyone else to respect.
In many ways, nations are just "abstract formations". Some things nationalists take their pride in don't even exist in actual reality. No matter if Germans or Poles can "rightfully claim" Copernicus, it's a moot point, because whatever Copernicus did has nothing to do with both Germany and Poland today. Copernicus is a really good example for this because he likely wouldn't even understand the question if he's German or Pole.
For example insulting a nation is often (maybe not always) at the same time insulting its members. Am I right?
You're not. What does "insulting a nation" even entail?
Is the sentence "I don't care about Armenia" insulting to the Armenian nation? I can care about what I want, and frankly, it really shouldn't matter to Armenians [or any other nation you could insert here] if I care. If they think their country is great, fine, I don't see what I've got to do with this.
Or are you referring to stuff like "all French are cheese eating surrender monkeys"? Things like that are usually stereotypes played for laughs. And even if you're not trying to make a joke, you literally can only insult a nation by attacking a stereotype. Because, you know, nations are made up by highly diverse individuals. If someone is insulted by it, hey, whom the shoe fits? But everyone's in the "insulted" nation is simply free to say "I don't fall under the stereotyped view you have on my country, so I don't care".
If someone says Germans don't have a sense of humour, I don't go "HOW DARE YOU, we had the Comedian Harmonists!" or whatever, I just say "I think my sense of humour is just fine, thank you".
I'm surprised that a German person in 21st century claims that nations don't deserve any respect or attention - experience of the Holocaust didn't teach you anything? Well, of course, Jewish nation received a lot of attention from the Germans during the Holocaust - just not enough respect.
I don't really know where to start here.
Firstly, arguments like that make me wish to delete my location entry. Seriously.
Secondly, your attempt to construe a "Jewish Nation" in pre-WW2 Germany is just stock full of Unfortunate Implications. It implies that German Jews were somehow a "foreign body" in Germany, and you know what? That's exactly the standard antisemitic argument that was used to agitate against Jews. Most Jews in Germany identified as German (with their own cultural and religious heritage, of course), which even led to things like Jewish WW1 veterans publicly displaying their war commendations during the rise of antisemitism to prove that they're loyal to the country (which only infuriated these antisemites even more, of course). To suggest there was a "Jewish nation" in Germany is just as ridiculous as to say there's a Jewish nation or a Black nation in the USA now. That even further goes to show that nation is an insufficient concept to describe cultural identities in any meaningful way.
Thirdly, are you seriously suggesting that the problem with the holocaust was lack of national respect? Seriously? It was an endeavor solely fueled by nationalism and its even uglier stepchild, racism. Most of the arguments fielded by you, like national achievements and history, are exactly the justifications the Nazis employed to style themselves a "master race" and to be entitled to commit the holocaust in the first place. So even though I hate invoking Godwin,
have you learned anything from the holocaust? Talk about backfiring analogies.
If you say that nations don't deserve and shouldn't demand from the world public any "respect" - then why nowadays there is so much condemnation for those, who - for example - do not respect Jewish nation? Just because they were so opressed in the past (more than others?). Or there is some specific reason?
I don't know where you're taking that from. There are people who hate Jews, period, whether they're part of the Jewish nation (namely, Israel) or not. So nationalism doesn't really enter into it. Then there are people who don't like Israel, because of what it does, and it's only incidental that it's a Jewish state (those for whom it isn't belong into the first group).