I only looked at the 1st page and this one, but I'm surprised I haven't seen North Korea being mentioned - They worship a leader who wasn't that good (at least what I know about him), and are only beginning to feel sentiment for their current crappy leader who is starving them.
*Remembers the "Curie and Copernicus belong to US" debates*
You guys can't be serious. The Greek-Turkish Internet war has been raging for years in forums and comment boxes of youtube videos.
I'll tie the two at first place.
I dunno, those Eastern Europeans may take the cake.
Practically every Azerbaijani, Armenian, Russian and Pole I've encountered on the internet is a bigoted nationalist
You guys can't be serious. The Greek-Turkish Internet war has been raging for years in forums and comment boxes of youtube videos.
I'll tie the two at first place.
I dunno, those Eastern Europeans may take the cake.
R: - Also the real meaning of the word patriotism is now changing. In the past - great, with great significance, nowadays patriotism is mentioned in negative context, while in fact...
W: - By whom?
R: - Well, there are such newspapers.
M: - By our trainers, hahaha.
R: - There are such newspapers, yes. Because, we have 3 terms here: patriotism, nationalism and chauvinism. Today also patriotism is classified as such a specific form of nationalism.
W: - Patriotism is just simply solidarity with one's own nation...
R: - And nationalism?
W: - But I haven't finished yet. The reason for this solidarity is because it is my nation. And the accusation of xenophobia refers to this - that a person distinguishes between "my people" and "the others". A patriot is someone who distinguishes between "ours" and "others" and I, as a Pole, will treat a Pole differently than a German or a Hungarian. And nationalism - it is solidarity with one's own nation not because it is my nation, but because I consider it to be a better nation than other nations. And I consider as appropriate to exalt myself due to this fact, so...
R: - Exalting but not at the cost of other nations? Because this would be chauvinism.
M: - I think that nationalism is a very natural view. A person is usually complacent with oneself, unless they have some reasons to be unsatisfied with oneself. Nationalism in general is a political view, we need to start with this, which comes down to the fact that every ethnic community should politically organize itself into a state. Nationalism is also present Jews in the form of Zionism, nobody considers it as something wrong. It is a view just as any other view. We can of course dispute with it, but it doesn't deserve for condemnation per se and a priori...
W: - However, in my understanding Zionism very clearly contains this form of nationalism which says that this is a better nation.
M: - May I finish, Mr professor? The difference between nationalism and chauvinism... - it can be best explained with use of comparison to family relations. Nationalism rests on the situation when for example I have children - so I am responsible in the first instance for my own children, because they are my children, I gave them life, etc. While for someone else's children I am of course responsible but only, so to speak, in the second instance. While chauvinism...
W: - In the fourth instance...
M: - Ok, let's say so. Never mind. While chauvinism would rest on - using the same comparison to family relations - that I would start to murder someone else's children in order to secure better chances for my own ones.
R: - Apart from antisemitism, very often, also a word called xenophobe functions in language. Who is xenophobe?
W: - But this word is a new invention. The case of antisemitism is old, while xenophobe - this is generalization of the concept of antisemite. At first the notion of antisemitism was going to be penalized. And now the scope of it was expanded [to other nations than Semites]. And so xenophobe is such a "generalized antisemite". Simply aversion in general to strangers.
M: - Yes, exactly, properly it is anxiety, fear of strangers. Literally it means fear of strangers, so...
W: - Even caution of strangers.
M: - Even caution of strangers. I think that a certain dose of xenophobia is by and large indispensible, in order to determine one's identity.
W: - Yes, for example when you lock the door to your own house behind you when you go out! Then you are clearly a xenophobe! Hahaha!
M: - But even to determine one's identity. For example children, students of 1st class of primary school. Some of them are from class I A and some from class I B. And they talk about themselves: "We are from I A, those guys are from I B". And this is showing that those from I B are "strangers" and they are "not ours". Thus, some minimum of xenophobia is a necessary condition of determining one's identity - such a distance, caution, I think.
W: - There are various antipathies between various nations, and this is quite a normal thing. Something different is abnormal - that these antipathies are desired to be penalized. That people are supposed to be legally, under legal criminal sanction, forced to treat all other nations kindly. Everyone has right to their own antipathies and legal system should have nothing to do with it.
GermanyNow I use the term 'nationalistic' as a synonym for 'loves their country', 'patriotic', 'my country, right or wrong', 'jingoistic, whatever. I know it has a few different meanings, but let's not be pedantic asshats by picking apart the thread when it's perfectly clear what I'm asking.
Countries I think should be considered
USA
UK
China
Russia
Poland
Australia
France
Japan
RedRalph said:Now I use the term 'nationalistic' as a synonym for 'loves their country', 'patriotic', 'my country, right or wrong', 'jingoistic, whatever. I know it has a few different meanings, but let's not be pedantic asshats by picking apart the thread when it's perfectly clear what I'm asking.
US american have a grand faith in the destiny of their nation and think that it does good, always.
Wait, if identifying Eastern Europeans as "nationalists" is self-refuting, then doesn't the same apply to your identification of Westerners as "nationalist"? Which then goes on to identify you as the real nationalist, but by pointing that out, you can't be, because I must be the real nationalist. But if you say as much, then I'm not a nationaist, you are, and round and round we go until I have to get off and throw up.Yes I agree that Americans are by far the most nationalistic and chavunist nation on Earth. Russians, who weep over "lost empire", follow closely.
Dachs (who is American) even said that "but Americans are justified to be nationalistic, because they really are great" - or something like this.
Claims that Eastern Europeans are nationalistic are false.
These nations were in the "far end" of the world from 1945 to 1989 and nowadays just want more attention in the world - which they deserve.
On the other hand, so called "Westerners" deny this attention and importance to these, so called, "East Europeans". And insult them, calling them nationalists.
That's because "Westerners" are nationalists themselves, and don't want to give up even a small chunk of their "importance in the world", to someone else.
Thank you. Hope your nationalistic "Western" hearts and brains will not get insulted by this honest truth, which I just revealed.![]()
Germans are very proud of having achieved the greatness of not being nationalisticGermany
Haha, as if you could take anything Dachs says at face value. I'm at least 90% sure that was self-deprecating sarcasm.Dachs (who is American) even said that "but Americans are justified to be nationalistic, because they really are great" - or something like this.
Personal definitions may differ, but in my opinion, to even hold the position that there is a certain amount of "respect" or "attention" nations deserve and should therefore demand from the world public, is sufficient to fulfill the definition of a nationalist.Claims that Eastern Europeans are nationalistic are false.
These nations were in the "far end" of the world from 1945 to 1989 and nowadays just want more attention in the world - which they deserve.
On the other hand, so called "Westerners" deny this attention and importance to these, so called, "East Europeans". And insult them, calling them nationalists.
That's because "Westerners" are nationalists themselves, and don't want to give up even a small chunk of their "importance in the world", to someone else.
Thank you. Hope your nationalistic "Western" hearts and brains will not get insulted by this honest truth, which I just revealed.![]()