EgonSpengler
Deity
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2014
- Messages
- 12,249
Deja Vu (2006) was good fun, and the last Tony Scott-Denzel Washington movie I hadn't seen yet.
Love that movie. Very much about the characters though. Winona Ryder was subtly so great in that movie - just the way she portrayed a very sympathetic character and the subtexts of her situation. It was a movie I appreciated more on subsequent viewings.Watched Age of Innocence last night, a movie in which nothing much happened to some characters I didn't care about. Beautifully made but not something I'd rewatch.
Winona Ryder was good, I didn't like the husband at all though.Love that movie. Very much about the characters though. Winona Ryder was subtly so great in that movie - just the way she portrayed a very sympathetic character and the subtexts of her situation. It was a movie I appreciated more on subsequent viewings.
DDL's character? It's been a while since my first viewing, but I recall just loving Rider's character and not liking his character partly for that reason. Likewise, I was not very sympathetic to the affair on first viewing, as I missed some of the context. I'd not read the book and just missed certain things on first viewing. The second time around, I caught on to more of the subtext, plus I was more familiar with Wharton's work like Ethan Fromme and House of Mirth (both of which have pretty good movie adaptations - EF with Liam Neeson and Patricia Arquette and Mirth with the great Gillian Anderson - check em out). Wharton was almost Hardy-esque in her dissection and criticism of societal norms of the time. Her stories tend to be pretty grim though.Winona Ryder was good, I didn't like the husband at all though.
I did enjoy the narrator's dissections of the hypocrisy of that society in a very dry manner (and I presume that was Wharton's words). I didn't particularly like Michelle Pfeffier's character although I can see she was caught in a trap that was hard to navigate. DDL's character became a little more sympathetic at the end of the movie but for much of it wasn't. I think I might have enjoyed the book (never read any Wharton) more than the film which was very slow.DDL's character? It's been a while since my first viewing, but I recall just loving Rider's character and not liking his character partly for that reason. Likewise, I was not very sympathetic to the affair on first viewing, as I missed some of the context. I'd not read the book and just missed certain things on first viewing. The second time around, I caught on to more of the subtext, plus I was more familiar with Wharton's work like Ethan Fromme and House of Mirth (both of which have pretty good movie adaptations - EF with Liam Neeson and Patricia Arquette and Mirth with the great Gillian Anderson - check em out). Wharton was almost Hardy-esque in her dissection and criticism of societal norms of the time. Her stories tend to be pretty grim though.
Why?I watched The Untouchables. It was very difficult to root for revenuers, even if one of them was Sean O'Connery.
Why?
Samuel Jackson, Juliette Lewis and Eli Roth reflect on the shocking, provocative career of Quentin Tarantino, from his underdog beginnings and mainstream breakthrough to blockbuster revenge epics like Inglourious Basterds and Django Unchained.
One of my all-time favs!The Day After Tomorrow (2004). I needed something brainless, and this was just the ticket. As big, dumb disaster movies go, this is one of the better ones. Not quite as good as The Core (2003), but better than Armageddon (1998), which I always thought was a little overrated.
Yes, it was spectacular.The Poseidon Adventure (from 1972) is easily my favorite disaster movie.
That dining hall scene (christmas tree climbing) is still spectacular even now![]()
C'mon, Negative Review WitchI agree with Armageddon being overrated..would even say only the star actors saved this from being recognized as boring soap.
The Core was.................nope this time i will not make enemies here![]()