You of all people should know that ethnicity, let alone nationality, has no genetic relevance whatsoever. Masada's Huguenot French ancestry will not show up in his DNA - and it certainly wouldn't make up a "percentage" of anything. Neither will Thlayli's Sicilianness, or my own Norwegian ancestry.Why is it stupid? Even if I was raised in a certain culture, my background in different nations is still interesting and relevant, even if the relevance is only genetic.
i'm a pacifist at heart really
anybody here have the Mass Effect 3 Demo and feel like exchanging Multiplayer tags?
There isn't.I play PC. I don't think there's a connection between the different systems, right?
You of all people should know that ethnicity, let alone nationality, has no genetic relevance whatsoever. Masada's Huguenot French ancestry will not show up in his DNA - and it certainly wouldn't make up a "percentage" of anything. Neither will Thlayli's Sicilianness, or my own Norwegian ancestry.
There's some genetic relevance, though it's muddied to the point of meaninglessness when populations interact.
Speaking of video games I have three free beta keys to Super MNC if anyone wants them, I don't know enough interested in it.
Speaking of video games I have three free beta keys to Super MNC if anyone wants them, I don't know enough interested in it.
I'd say there's genetic relevance between China and Peru. I'd say that the relevance is next to nothing when comparing Germany and Poland.
Because there's no genetic marker synonymous with German, French or Norwegian. It's that damned simple.Lord_Iggy said:Still, I don't see why you're opposed to saying percentage ancestry. It's an interesting, if trivial set of facts, and it's a stepping stone to understanding family history and how that fits into world events.
Because there's no genetic marker synonymous with German, French or Norwegian. It's that damned simple.