White Genocide

Status
Not open for further replies.
I suppose it could be, if all the white people in mixed-race relationships are doing so specifically because they don't want pure white children. That's a hell of a caveat though.

But yeah, that's clearly not the case and racists are idiots.
 
In White Nationalist circles the term White Genocide gets thrown around a lot, it is usually in reference to "White" people having children with "Non Whites". Is this a fair use of the term genocide in your opinion?

Nope. The genes still exist and their decedents have them. They're just being stupid but that's what we've all come to accept from racist groups.
 
I hear there are some Jews who think their people survived millennium of persecution and murder, only to have their children marry out of the faith and their grandchildren raised something other than Jews. They've got a better call to be upset than these white fools.
No, they're equally as ********.

Race obsession is pathetic no matter how you slice it (unless you're trying to secure equal rights).

Anyway, the term genocide makes no sense unless it's white women getting raped by non-white men. Even then the kids are still half white.

If me & my male descendents mated with a bunch of black or Chinese ladies for 10 generations forward the 10th generation would still be a little bit white (and alota bit awesome :)) even if little to no trace of Caucasian attributes was apparent. I feel truly sorry for anyone who believes the most important thing about who they are is their skin tone or heritage. :(
 
No, they're equally as ********.

Race obsession is pathetic no matter how you slice it (unless you're trying to secure equal rights).
Theirs would be religious obsession rather than race obsession though. /nitpick
Not that it changes anything.
 
It is genocide since it leads to an ethnic group becoming extinct. If everyone in a native american tribe slept with people outside that tribe it would disappear. Another great example are the white people that lived in persia and India a few thousand years ago.

People who say they support multiculturalism and diversity don't. They hate white people. They don't want massive Chinese immigration to Tibet. If millions of white Europeans moved to an African country, became the majority there and displaced the local ethnic groups and cultures people wouldn't accept it.

Also it is not diversity. Diversity is when you have many different ethnic groups and cultures. Not when you mix every one so that people are the same every where.
 
431659_10150713864322673_122021577672_11039728_1477183095_n.jpg
 
what's a white person and how do i define one? hint: if we're using a 'i think i'm white, therefore i'm white' approach that rules out the biological approach i.e. the sole one that could possibly object to interracial relationships.

and shame on you people for accepting 'white' as a meaningful metric to begin with.
 
what's a white person and how do i define one? hint: if we're using a 'i think i'm white, therefore i'm white' approach that rules out the biological approach i.e. the sole one that could possibly object to interracial relationships.

and shame on you people for accepting 'white' as a meaningful metric to begin with.

Ridiculous question. How do we know if someone is native American? How do we know if someone is African? Basically what you are saying is that white people don't exist. Would you really go to Kongo and say "You people don't exist. There are no black people. You are just a silly social construct and I hope that Chinese people become the majority in your country and that your ethnic group disappears"? I think not. But you gladly do so in a white country. Anti white

Also, just out of curiosity are you jewish?
 
It is genocide since it leads to an ethnic group becoming extinct. If everyone in a native american tribe slept with people outside that tribe it would disappear. Another great example are the white people that lived in persia and India a few thousand years ago.

People who say they support multiculturalism and diversity don't. They hate white people. They don't want massive Chinese immigration to Tibet. If millions of white Europeans moved to an African country, became the majority there and displaced the local ethnic groups and cultures people wouldn't accept it.

Also it is not diversity. Diversity is when you have many different ethnic groups and cultures. Not when you mix every one so that people are the same every where.

So your claim is that any time a white marries a nonwhite it is genocide (the intentional extermination of a species or race)? So if 1% of white marry nonwhite that would still be genecide because whites would some how cease to exist? Sorry but there are a lot of variables you're not taking into account such as the population growth rate of white as well as the population growth rate of part white. If there are more whites in a few years then there were previously the race is hardly endangered even if the population of part whites has gone up.

This, of course, ignores the whole people deciding to marry someone else outside of their race is not genocide thing as well as the fact that race is entirely socially constructed.
 
So your claim is that any time a white marries a nonwhite it is genocide (the intentional extermination of a species or race)? So if 1% of white marry nonwhite that would still be genecide because whites would some how cease to exist? Sorry but there are a lot of variables you're not taking into account such as the population growth rate of white as well as the population growth rate of part white. If there are more whites in a few years then there were previously the race is hardly endangered even if the population of part whites has gone up.

This, of course, ignores the whole people deciding to marry someone else outside of their race is not genocide thing as well as the fact that race is entirely socially constructed.

So there are no black people and you would have no problem if all black people where wiped of the face of the Earth?
 
Whiped out? As in they all have children with non-africans?

I for one wouldn't have a problem with that. As long as it's consensual.
 
Whiped out? As in they all have children with non-africans?

I for one wouldn't have a problem with that. As long as it's consensual.

So if an African said I want my people to survive, I want my culture to live and I want my own country to live in you would call him a racist?

What about jews? Do they exist? Do you believe that jews should disappear? Or is it only white people that this applies to?
 
So if an African said I want my people to survive, I want my culture to live and I want my own country to live in you would call him a racist?

If that means exclusivity based on skin color or whatever then yeah. I'd say they're racist.
 
So if an African said I want my people to survive, I want my culture to live and I want my own country to live in you would call him a racist?

What about jews? Do they exist? Do you believe that jews should disappear? Or is it only white people that this applies to?

An african who wanted all africans to breed according to his plan would be a rasist, yes. Poeple can get children whith whoever they want, as far as I am concerned. It has nothing to do with genocide.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom